A Path Model Linking Business Analytics, Data-Driven Culture, and Competitive Advantage

Business analytics (BA) has become increasingly important for companies to gain valuable insights from big data and ultimately competitive advantage. However, little empirical evidence exists regarding the mechanisms through which BA impacts on competitive advantage. In light of this paucity, this paper aims to advance our understanding of the impact of BA on competitive advantage. First, this paper provides a BA classification. Second, drawing on contingency theory and the resource-based view, it develops a research model that specifies the paths from BA to competitive advantage. Third, it empirically tests the proposed model using structural equation modelling, offering valuable insights into how different types of BA impact on competitive advantage. Fourth, it systematically tests how resource value, rarity and inimitability impact on competitive advantage. The findings demonstrate that BA, through the mediation of a data-driven culture, positively impacts on information processing capabilities, which in turn have a positive effect on competitive advantage. The findings also demonstrate that resource value, rarity and inimitability partially but strongly mediate the impact of information processing capabilities on competitive advantage. Finally, the paper contributes to managers’ knowledge by demonstrating how different types of BA should be implemented to develop information processing capabilities and gain competitive advantage.

[1]  Gaby Odekerken-Schröder,et al.  Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: guidelines and impirical illustration , 2009 .

[2]  Saggi Nevo,et al.  Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment , 2011, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  François Rechenmann,et al.  From data to knowledge , 2000, Bioinform..

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[6]  Peter Trkman,et al.  Business analytics in supply chains - The contingent effect of business process maturity , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[8]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research , 2012 .

[10]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[11]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[12]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  L. Phillips Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[17]  David J. Miller,et al.  An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability , 2003 .

[18]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[20]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[21]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Path Dependence of Dynamic Information Technology Capability: An Empirical Investigation , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew Their Resource Base , 2009 .

[23]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[24]  Véronique Ambrosini,et al.  What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management? , 2009 .

[25]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[28]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[29]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[30]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[31]  Jeanne G. Harris,et al.  Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning , 2007 .

[32]  GroverVarun,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[33]  David A. Nadler,et al.  A model for diagnosing organizational behavior , 1980 .

[34]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Why IT Fumbles Analytics , 2013 .

[36]  T. Davenport,et al.  Data to Knowledge to Results: Building an Analytic Capability , 2001 .

[37]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[38]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[39]  Scott L. Newbert Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research , 2007 .

[40]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[41]  Dominic Barton,et al.  Making advanced analytics work for you. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[42]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[43]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[44]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[46]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Infrastructure Flexibility on Strategic Alignment and Application Implementations , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[48]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency-Based Perspective , 1994 .

[49]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[50]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[51]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[52]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  John M. Ward,et al.  Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[54]  T. Davenport Competing on analytics. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[55]  Gideon D. Markman,et al.  Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources , 2004 .

[56]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[57]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[58]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  Contingency Theory: Some Suggested Directions , 1984 .

[59]  A. Coughlan,et al.  An Empirical Investigation * , 2002 .