A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets

Developing the “right” new products is critical to firm success and is often cited as a key competitive dimension. This paper explores new product development (NPD) portfolio strategy and the balance between incremental and radical innovation. We characterize innovative effort through a normative theoretical framework that addresses a popular practice in NPD portfolio management: the use of strategic buckets. Strategic buckets encourage the division of the overall NPD resource budget into smaller, more focused budgets that are defined by the type of innovative effort (incremental or radical). We show that time commitment determines the balance between incremental and radical innovation. When managers execute this balance, they are often confounded by (i) environmental complexity, defined as the number of unknown interdependencies among technology and market parameters that determine product performance; and (ii) environmental instability, the probability of changes to the underlying performance functions. Although both of these factors confound managers, we find that they have completely opposite effects on the NPD portfolio balance. Environmental complexity shifts the balance toward radical innovation. Conversely, environmental instability shifts the balance toward incremental innovation. Risk considerations and implications for theory and practice are also discussed.

[1]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Optimal search on a technology landscape , 2000 .

[2]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[3]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[4]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  A Model of Fair Process and Its Limits , 2008 .

[5]  Philip A. Roussel,et al.  Third generation R & D : managing the link to corporate strategy / Philip A. Roussel, Kamal N. Saad, Tamara J. Erickson , 1991 .

[6]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management , 2007 .

[7]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  Handbook of New Product Development Management , 2007 .

[8]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[9]  C. Loch Tailoring product development to strategy: case of a European technology manufacturer , 2000 .

[10]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[11]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[12]  J S Hammond,et al.  Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[13]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Chapter 1 – Managing new product development: An evolutionary framework1 , 2007 .

[14]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management for New Products (Управление портфелем новых продуктов) , 1998 .

[18]  Elie Ofek,et al.  How Much Does the Market Value an Improvement in a Product Attribute , 2002 .

[19]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[20]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[21]  Uriel G. Rothblum,et al.  Index Policies for Stochastic Search in a Forest with an Application to R&D Project Management , 2004, Math. Oper. Res..

[22]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[23]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[24]  J. V. Mieghem Dynamic Scheduling with Convex Delay Costs: The Generalized CU Rule , 1995 .

[25]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Radical Innovation and Corporate Regeneration , 1994 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[28]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[29]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[30]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Selecting R&D projects at BMW: a case study of adopting mathematical programming models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[31]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[32]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  Selecting product development projects: pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies , 1993 .

[33]  M. S. Brenner Practical R&D Project Prioritization , 1994 .

[34]  J. Bather,et al.  Multi‐Armed Bandit Allocation Indices , 1990 .

[35]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Dynamic Portfolio Selection of NPD Programs Using Marginal Returns , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Wayne E. Smith Various optimizers for single‐stage production , 1956 .

[37]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[39]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[40]  George Westerman,et al.  Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability , 2002 .

[41]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Bandit problems and the exploration/exploitation tradeoff , 1998, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..