Preserved Tool Knowledge in the Context of Impaired Action Knowledge: Implications for Models of Semantic Memory

A number of studies have observed that the motor system is activated when processing the semantics of manipulable objects. Such phenomena have been taken as evidence that simulation over motor representations is a necessary and intermediary step in the process of conceptual understanding. Cognitive neuropsychological evaluations of patients with impairments for action knowledge permit a direct test of the necessity of motor simulation in conceptual processing. Here, we report the performance of a 47-year-old male individual (Case AA) and six age-matched control participants on a number of tests probing action and object knowledge. Case AA had a large left-hemisphere frontal-parietal lesion and hemiplegia affecting his right arm and leg. Case AA presented with impairments for object-associated action production, and his conceptual knowledge of actions was severely impaired. In contrast, his knowledge of objects such as tools and other manipulable objects was largely preserved. The dissociation between action and object knowledge is difficult to reconcile with strong forms of the embodied cognition hypothesis. We suggest that these, and other similar findings, point to the need to develop tractable hypotheses about the dynamics of information exchange among sensory, motor and conceptual processes.

[1]  Liuba Papeo,et al.  Action performance and action-word understanding: Evidence of double dissociations in left-damaged patients , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  K. Heilman,et al.  Pantomime agnosia. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[5]  David A. Wolk,et al.  The role of sensory-motor information in object recognition: Evidence from category-specific visual agnosia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[6]  J R Crawford,et al.  Payne and Jones revisited: estimating the abnormality of test score differences using a modified paired samples t test. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[7]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[10]  H. Goodglass Boston diagnostic aphasia examination , 2013 .

[11]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  K. Heilman,et al.  Ideomotor apraxia: Error pattern analysis , 1988 .

[13]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[14]  J. Hodges,et al.  Kissing and dancing—a test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation. Preliminary results in patients with frontotemporal dementia , 2003, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[15]  Alessia Tessari,et al.  Neuropsychological evidence for a strategic control of multiple routes in imitation. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  What happens to the motor theory of perception when the motor system is damaged? , 2013, Language and Cognition.

[19]  J. Fiez,et al.  Standardized stimuli and procedures for investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Rolf A. Zwaan The Immersed Experiencer: Toward An Embodied Theory Of Language Comprehension , 2003 .

[21]  Richard J. Brown Neuropsychology Mental Structure , 1989 .

[22]  Alessia Tessari,et al.  Imitation of novel and well-known actions: the role of short-term memory. , 2002, Experimental brain research.

[23]  Salvatore Maria Aglioti,et al.  The Sound of Actions in Apraxia , 2008, Current Biology.

[24]  H. Poizner,et al.  Progressive Ideomotor Apraxia - Evidence for a Selective Impairment of the Action Production System , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[25]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[26]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Functional links between motor and language systems , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  David J. Heeger,et al.  A mirror up to nature , 2008 .

[28]  C Chiarello,et al.  Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[29]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[31]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  Eight Problems for the Mirror Neuron Theory of Action Understanding in Monkeys and Humans , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  BORB: Birmingham Object Recognition Battery , 2017 .

[33]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’ , 2000 .

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[35]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[36]  K. Heilman,et al.  Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use , 1989, Annals of neurology.

[37]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream , 2007 .

[38]  Erminio Capitani,et al.  Picture reality decision, semantic categories and gender A new set of pictures, with norms and an experimental study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[41]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain , 1991, Nature.

[45]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  K. Heilman,et al.  Age-related changes in arm–hand postural knowledge , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[47]  T Shallice,et al.  A Form of Ideational Apraxia as a Delective Deficit of Contention Scheduling , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[48]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[50]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  M Besson,et al.  The Snodgrass and Vanderwart Set Revisited: Norms for Object Manipulability and for Pictorial Ambiguity of Objects, Chimeric Objects, and Nonobjects , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[52]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[54]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Effects of TMS on Different Stages of Motor and Non-Motor Verb Processing in the Primary Motor Cortex , 2009, PloS one.

[55]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[56]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics , 2010 .

[57]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from Neuropsychology , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[58]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[59]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[60]  Frank E Garcea,et al.  What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[61]  R. Rumiati,et al.  Imitation of transitive and intransitive actions in healthy individuals , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[62]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[64]  L. G. Gonzalez Rothi,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology Florida Apraxia Battery-extended and Revised Sydney (fabers): Design, Description, and a Healthy Control Sample Florida Apraxia Battery–extended and Revised Sydney (fabers): Design, Description, and a Healthy Control , 2022 .

[65]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The representation of grammatical categories in the brain , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Processing Abstract Language Modulates Motor System Activity , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  S. Keeler,et al.  Listening in Action , 1989 .

[68]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  D. Tranel,et al.  Patterns of dissociation in the processing of verb meanings in brain-damaged subjects , 2001 .

[71]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[72]  D. Tranel,et al.  Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions , 2012, Cortex.

[73]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[74]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[75]  J. Pellat,et al.  Identification without manipulation: a study of the relations between object use and semantic memory , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  P. Garthwaite,et al.  Point and interval estimates of effect sizes for the case-controls design in neuropsychology: Rationale, methods, implementations, and proposed reporting standards , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[77]  M. Arbib,et al.  Language within our grasp , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.