Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science
暂无分享,去创建一个
Iain E. Buchan | Mo Wang | Matthew Sperrin | Mattia Prosperi | Jiang Bian | James S. Koopman | I. Buchan | J. Koopman | M. Prosperi | J. Bian | M. Sperrin | Mo Wang
[1] Jeffrey B. Vancouver,et al. In Defense of HARKing , 2018, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
[2] C.H.J. Hartgerink,et al. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread p-hacking , 2017, PeerJ.
[3] U. Dirnagl,et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014, The Lancet.
[4] Reza Zafarani,et al. Social Media Mining: An Introduction , 2014 .
[5] Paul Faya,et al. Bayesian assurance and sample size determination in the process validation life-cycle , 2017, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.
[6] Craig,et al. Corrigendum: Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results , 2018, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.
[7] C. Chambers. Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex , 2013, Cortex.
[8] Gary S Collins,et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[9] D. Moher,et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[10] Gerd Gigerenzer. We need statistical thinking, not statistical rituals , 1998, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[11] Tim Chartier. Vertigo Over the Seven V's of Big Data , 2016 .
[12] Ziad Salameh,et al. P-Hacking: A Wake-Up Call for the Scientific Community , 2018, Sci. Eng. Ethics.
[13] N. Eriksson,et al. Replicability and Robustness of Genome-Wide-Association Studies for Behavioral Traits , 2014, Psychological science.
[14] Anne-Mieke Vandamme,et al. The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing , 2009 .
[15] Anne-Mieke Vandamme,et al. The Phylogenetic Handbook: Index , 2009 .
[16] Douglas G. Altman,et al. Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015 , 2016, Research Integrity and Peer Review.
[17] P. Bennett,et al. Meta-analysis reveals association between most common class II haplotype in full-heritage Native Americans and rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Human immunology.
[18] M. Baker. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.
[19] Joshua Carp,et al. The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature , 2012, NeuroImage.
[20] Arcadi Navarro,et al. Replicability and Prediction: Lessons and Challenges from GWAS. , 2018, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[21] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Promoting an open research culture , 2015, Science.
[22] D. Penny. Inferring Phylogenies.—Joseph Felsenstein. 2003. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. , 2004 .
[23] Dana P Turner,et al. P‐Hacking in Headache Research , 2018, Headache.
[24] Leif D. Nelson,et al. False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.
[25] J. Ioannidis,et al. Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research , 2015, Circulation research.
[26] Breanne Chryst,et al. No Need for Bayes Factors: A Fully Bayesian Evidence Synthesis , 2017, Front. Appl. Math. Stat..
[27] J. Wicherts. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them) , 2017, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.
[28] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. Publication bias and the canonization of false facts , 2016, eLife.
[29] Martin Wilkie. Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Peritoneal Dialysis , 2017, Peritoneal Dialysis International.
[30] George Patounakis,et al. Clinical trial registry alone is not adequate: on the perception of possible endpoint switching and P-hacking. , 2018, Human reproduction.
[31] John Carson Allen,et al. P-Hacking in Orthopaedic Literature: A Twist to the Tail. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[32] Paul A Murtaugh,et al. In defense of P values. , 2014, Ecology.
[33] Scott C. Schmidler,et al. α-Stable Limit Laws for Harmonic Mean Estimators of Marginal Likelihoods , 2012 .
[34] Robert Tibshirani,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.
[35] J G Thornton,et al. Inadvertent P‐hacking among trials and systematic reviews of the effect of progestogens in pregnancy? A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[36] Michèle B. Nuijten,et al. Distributions of p-values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on? , 2016, PeerJ.
[37] G. Collins,et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[38] A. Gelman,et al. The garden of forking paths : Why multiple comparisons can be a problem , even when there is no “ fishing expedition ” or “ p-hacking ” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time ∗ , 2019 .
[39] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Inference for the Generalization Error , 1999, Machine Learning.
[40] David Colquhoun,et al. The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of P values , 2017, bioRxiv.
[41] H. Browman,et al. Welfare of aquatic organisms: is there some faith-based HARKing going on here? , 2011, Diseases of aquatic organisms.
[42] Peter Kraft,et al. Replication in genome-wide association studies. , 2009, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
[43] Angelo Nuzzo,et al. An automated reasoning framework for translational research , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.
[44] Brad Verhulst. In Defense of P Values. , 2016, AANA journal.
[45] Igor Douven,et al. Probabilistic alternatives to Bayesianism: the case of explanationism , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[46] Trevor Hastie,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .
[47] Andrew Gelman,et al. Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons , 2009, 0907.2478.
[48] D. Mehler,et al. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond , 2018, PLoS biology.
[49] N. Kerr. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
[50] Herman Aguinis,et al. HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta‐Analytic Sources , 2016 .
[51] John P A Ioannidis. Handling the fragile vase of scientific practices. , 2015, Addiction.
[52] Han L. J. van der Maas,et al. Science Perspectives on Psychological an Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .
[53] Philip Sedgwick. What is publication bias in a meta-analysis? , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[54] Taha Yasseri,et al. A Biased Review of Biases in Twitter Studies on Political Collective Action , 2016, Front. Phys..
[55] Jan P Vandenbroucke,et al. The making of STROBE. , 2007, Epidemiology.
[56] Edward I. George,et al. The Practical Implementation of Bayesian Model Selection , 2001 .
[57] Alison Ledgerwood,et al. The preregistration revolution needs to distinguish between predictions and analyses , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[58] R. Lanfear,et al. The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science , 2015, PLoS biology.
[59] Uri Simonsohn,et al. Posterior-Hacking: Selective Reporting Invalidates Bayesian Results Also , 2014 .
[60] J. Ioannidis,et al. STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement , 2009, PLoS medicine.
[61] John R. Platt,et al. Number 3642 Strong Inference Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking , 2012 .
[62] René Veenstra,et al. I Just Ran a Thousand Analyses: Benefits of Multiple Testing in Understanding Equivocal Evidence on Gene-Environment Interactions , 2015, PloS one.
[63] C. Arango,et al. Candidate gene associations studies in psychiatry: time to move forward , 2017, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.
[64] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. A manifesto for reproducible science , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[65] N. Lazar,et al. Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05” , 2019, The American Statistician.
[66] Jan P Vandenbroucke. Preregistration: when shall we start the real discussion? , 2015, European journal of public health.
[67] Elias Bareinboim,et al. External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations , 2014, Probabilistic and Causal Inference.
[68] J S Koopman,et al. Epigenesis theory: a mathematical model relating causal concepts of pathogenesis in individuals to disease patterns in populations. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.
[69] Jan P. Vandenbroucke,et al. On Compulsory Preregistration of Protocols , 2012 .
[70] J. Pearl. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .
[71] Andrew Gelman,et al. Multilevel (Hierarchical) Modeling: What It Can and Cannot Do , 2006, Technometrics.
[72] George Amato,et al. A phylogenetic hypothesis for Crocodylus (Crocodylia) based on mitochondrial DNA: evidence for a trans-Atlantic voyage from Africa to the New World. , 2011, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[73] Lifeng Lin,et al. Quantifying publication bias in meta‐analysis , 2018, Biometrics.
[74] A. Lusis,et al. Considerations for the design of omics studies , 2017 .
[75] Timothy L Lash,et al. Commentary: Should Preregistration of Epidemiologic Study Protocols Become Compulsory? Reflections and a Counterproposal , 2012, Epidemiology.
[76] Mark Rubin,et al. When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress , 2017 .
[77] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research , 2016, PloS one.
[78] John R. Hollenbeck,et al. Harking, Sharking, and Tharking , 2017 .
[79] Teri A Manolio,et al. Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[80] Igor Douven,et al. Inference to the Best Explanation, Dutch Books, and Inaccuracy Minimisation , 2013 .
[81] J. Platt. Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.
[82] Hans Ekkehard Plesser,et al. Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology , 2018, Front. Neuroinform..
[83] M. Ramoni,et al. An epistemological framework for medical knowledge-based systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[84] Ruth Heller,et al. Repfdr: a Tool for Replicability Analysis for Genome-wide Association Studies , 2014, Bioinform..
[85] Thomas Boraud,et al. Replication Validity of Initial Association Studies: A Comparison between Psychiatry, Neurology and Four Somatic Diseases , 2016, PloS one.
[86] J. Ioannidis. The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005. , 2018, JAMA.
[87] R. Stine. Model Selection Using Information Theory and the MDL Principle , 2004 .
[88] Daniël Lakens,et al. What p-hacking really looks like , 2014 .
[89] F. Korner‐Nievergelt,et al. The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research , 2017, PeerJ.
[90] Jelte M. Wicherts,et al. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[91] Hayden C. Metsky,et al. Genomic epidemiology reveals multiple introductions of Zika virus into the United States , 2017, Nature.
[92] Rolf Ulrich,et al. p-hacking by post hoc selection with multiple opportunities: Detectability by skewness test?: Comment on Simonsohn, Nelson, and Simmons (2014). , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[93] Joseph J. Mazzola,et al. Forgetting What We Learned as Graduate Students: HARKing and Selective Outcome Reporting in I–O Journal Articles , 2013, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.