Advantages of Electromagnetic Interferometry Applied to Ground-Penetrating Radar : Non-Destructive Inspection and Characterization of the Subsurface Without Transmitting Anything

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a non-destructive method that images the subsurface using radar. A transmitter generates a radar pulse. This signal propagates into the ground where it reflects against subsurface heterogeneities, and travels back to the surface. A receiver records the reflected signal. The reflected signal contains information about the subsurface. GPR is useful for pavement- and structures- inspection, object-detection, and characterization of the subsurface. For example, many forms of pavement damage of highways originate in the bottom layers and are invisible until the pavement cracks come to surface. GPR can indicate pavement damage before it is visible at the surface, so that preventive actions can be performed where necessary. We work towards developing GPR without the need to transmit any signal. Instead, we use signals that are already available in the air, such as mobile phone signals. A technique called electromagnetic interferometry selects those signals that are measured before they enter the ground and after they reflect. It extracts the path from receiver to subsurface and back to the receiver. The result looks as if the receiver has transmitted a signal, while no signal was transmitted by that receiver. This receiver is called a virtual source. By repeating this step for many receiver combinations we create a virtual dataset. This virtual data provides a well-interpretable image of the subsurface.

[1]  Evert Slob,et al.  Seismic and electromagnetic controlled‐source interferometry in dissipative media , 2008 .

[2]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Radio Interferometry Depth Sounding: Part I—THEORETICAL Discussion , 1973 .

[3]  Geologian tutkimuskeskus,et al.  Geological Survey of Finland special paper , 1987 .

[4]  G. Simmons,et al.  Surface electrical properties experiment , 1972 .

[5]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  A representation for Green's function retrieval by multidimensional deconvolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Evert Slob,et al.  Let the FCC rules work for you: Turning commercial noise into useful data , 2006 .

[7]  Toshifumi Matsuoka,et al.  Singular-value decomposition analysis of source illumination in seismic interferometry by multidimensional deconvolution , 2013 .

[8]  E. Slob,et al.  Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 2 — Underlying theory and new advances , 2010 .

[9]  Stefano Marelli,et al.  A critical appraisal of asymptotic 3D-to-2D data transformation in full-waveform seismic crosshole tomography , 2013 .

[10]  Evert Slob,et al.  GPR without a source by use of interferometry by multi-dimensional deconvolution , 2014 .

[12]  Evert Slob,et al.  Surface and borehole ground-penetrating-radar developments , 2010 .

[13]  Evert C. Slob,et al.  Interferometry by Deconvolution of Multicomponent Multioffset GPR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  F. D'Amico,et al.  FDTD simulation of the GPR signal for effective inspection of pavement damages , 2014, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[15]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Seismic imaging of the site response using microearthquake recordings. Part II. Application to the Swabian Jura, southwest Germany, Seismic network , 1987 .

[16]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Landmine detection with ground penetrating radar using hidden Markov models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  S. Evans,et al.  Radio Echo Sounding of Polar Ice Sheets , 1964, Nature.

[18]  Frank Scherbaum Seismic imaging of the site response using microearthquake recordings. Part I. Method , 1987 .

[19]  Antonios Giannopoulos,et al.  Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax , 2005 .

[20]  J. L. Davis,et al.  GPR systems for roads and bridges , 1992 .

[21]  Evert Slob,et al.  Interferometric electromagnetic Green's functions representations using propagation invariants , 2007 .

[22]  Simon R. Saunders,et al.  Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communication Systems , 1999 .

[23]  M. Mellon,et al.  RIMFAX: A GPR for the Mars 2020 rover mission , 2015, 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).

[24]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Radio Frequency Tomography for Tunnel Detection , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Ram M. Narayanan,et al.  Design, performance, and applications of a coherent ultra-wideband random noise radar , 1998 .

[26]  T. Scullion,et al.  Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar , 2000 .

[27]  M. Partl,et al.  GPR inspection of a mountain motorway in Switzerland , 1998 .

[28]  F. Wenzel,et al.  Simulating three-dimensional seismograms in 2.5-dimensional structures by combining two-dimensional finite difference modelling and ray tracing , 2008 .

[29]  A. Wepster,et al.  European Cooperation in Science and Technology , 1981, Journal of Navigation.

[30]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[31]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Reciprocity Theorems for One-Way Wave Fields in Curvilinear Coordinate Systems , 2010, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[32]  Sune R. J. Axelsson,et al.  Noise Radar for range/Doppler processing and digital beamforming using low-bit ADC , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  S. J. Schmidt,et al.  Gross Errors in Height Indication from Pulsed Radar Altimeters Operating over Thick Ice or Snow , 1962, Proceedings of the IRE.

[34]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Estimating the location of a tunnel using correlation and inversion of Rayleigh wave scattering , 2013 .

[35]  P. M. van den Berg,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of multicomponent ground-penetrating radar data , 2003 .

[36]  E. Slob,et al.  Simulation of GPR passive interferometry using cross-correlation for LNAPL model monitoring application , 2011 .

[37]  Tom Scullion,et al.  AUTOMATED PAVEMENT SUBSURFACE PROFILING USING RADAR: CASE STUDIES OF FOUR EXPERIMENTAL FIELD SITES , 1992 .

[38]  Jacques R. Ernst,et al.  Application of a new 2D time-domain full-waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data , 2007 .

[39]  Mark Noble,et al.  Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion: Application to real data , 1990 .

[40]  Evert Slob,et al.  Electromagnetic Green's functions retrieval by cross‐correlation and cross‐convolution in media with losses , 2007 .

[41]  K. Wapenaar,et al.  Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 — Basic principles and applications , 2010 .

[42]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  3-D ground‐penetrating radar applied to fracture imaging in gneiss , 1996 .

[43]  Kees Wapenaar,et al.  Spurious multiples in seismic interferometry of primaries , 2006 .

[44]  N. Bleistein Two-and-One-Half Dimensional In-Plane Wave Propagation. , 1984 .

[45]  F. A. Roberts,et al.  Radar Logging of a Salt Dome , 1971 .

[46]  Alexander Yarovoy,et al.  Ultra-wideband sensor for electromagnetic field measurements in time domain , 2000 .

[47]  Evert Slob,et al.  Practical representations of electromagnetic interferometry for GPR applications: a tutorial , 2008 .

[48]  Lanbo Liu,et al.  Wave Interferometry Applied to Borehole Radar: Virtual Multioffset Reflection Profiling , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[49]  Alessandro Calvi,et al.  An effective approach for road maintenance through the simulation of GPR based pavements damage inspection , 2013 .