Training set optimization and classifier performance in a top-down diabetic retinopathy screening system

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects more than 4.4 million Americans age 40 and over. Automatic screening for DR has shown to be an efficient and cost-effective way to lower the burden on the healthcare system, by triaging diabetic patients and ensuring timely care for those presenting with DR. Several supervised algorithms have been developed to detect pathologies related to DR, but little work has been done in determining the size of the training set that optimizes an algorithm’s performance. In this paper we analyze the effect of the training sample size on the performance of a top-down DR screening algorithm for different types of statistical classifiers. Results are based on partial least squares (PLS), support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), and Naïve Bayes classifiers. Our dataset consisted of digital retinal images collected from a total of 745 cases (595 controls, 150 with DR). We varied the number of normal controls in the training set, while keeping the number of DR samples constant, and repeated the procedure 10 times using randomized training sets to avoid bias. Results show increasing performance in terms of area under the ROC curve (AUC) when the number of DR subjects in the training set increased, with similar trends for each of the classifiers. Of these, PLS and k-NN had the highest average AUC. Lower standard deviation and a flattening of the AUC curve gives evidence that there is a limit to the learning ability of the classifiers and an optimal number of cases to train on.

[1]  Lloyd Paul Aiello,et al.  Preventive Eye Care in People With Diabetes Is Cost-Saving to the Federal Government: Implications for health-care reform , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Multiscale AM-FM Demodulation and Image Reconstruction Methods With Improved Accuracy , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Victor Murray,et al.  Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration in digital fundus images. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  M. Barker,et al.  Partial least squares for discrimination , 2003 .

[7]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[8]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[9]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning , 1995 .

[10]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Real-time diabetic retinopathy patient screening using multiscale AM-FM methods , 2012, 2012 19th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  L. Aiello,et al.  Retinopathy in diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[13]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Qing Zeng-Treitler,et al.  On Sample Size and Classification Accuracy: A Performance Comparison , 2005, ISBMDA.