Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of technical content is important for instructors as well as students to learn content and apply knowledge in various contexts. Concept inventories that identify possible misconceptions through validated multiple-choice questions are helpful in identifying a misconception that may exist, but do not provide a meaningful assessment of why they exist or the nature of the students’ understanding. We conducted a case study with undergraduate students in an electrical engineering course by testing a validated multiple-choice response concept inventory that we augmented with a component for students to provide written explanations for their multiple-choice selection. Results revealed that correctly chosen multiple-choice selections did not always match correct conceptual understanding for question testing a specific concept. The addition of a text-response to multiple-choice concept inventory questions provided an enhanced and meaningful assessment of students’ conceptual understanding and highlighted variables associated with current concept inventories or multiple choice questions.
[1]
Wendy K. Adams,et al.
Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking
,
2011
.
[2]
D. Hestenes,et al.
A mechanics baseline test
,
1992
.
[3]
Barbara M. Olds,et al.
How to Create a Concept Inventory: The Thermal and Transport Concept Inventory
,
2007
.
[4]
Douglas B. Clark,et al.
An Overview of Conceptual Change Theories.
,
2007
.
[5]
Wayne T. Padgett,et al.
Extending the usefulness of the Signals and Systems Concept Inventory (SSCI)
,
2011,
2011 Digital Signal Processing and Signal Processing Education Meeting (DSP/SPE).
[6]
Lisa D. McNair,et al.
Using Writing to Link Procedures and Concepts in Statics
,
2013
.
[7]
Bill Jay Brooks,et al.
The AIChE "Concept Warehouse": A Web-Based Tool to Promote Concept-Based Instruction.
,
2014
.
[8]
John R. Buck,et al.
Active and cooperative learning in signal processing courses
,
2005,
IEEE Signal Process. Mag..