Decentralization and resource contributions within local governance networks: Evidence from health sector reform in Honduras

Many public services are co‐produced through networks of governmental and non‐governmental organizations that choose to or are obliged to contribute resources, a trend that has been reinforced through decentralization reforms. We utilize original data for 826 organizations across 65 local governance networks to assess how decentralization affects resource contributions while accounting for municipality context, network environment, and organizational attributes. Drawing on a quasi‐experimental design in the context of health sector reform in Honduras, we find that decentralization is associated with a slight reduction in the number of resource ties an organization contributes to other organizations in its network. This association is most prominent where municipal governments, rather than non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) or associations, are lead intermediary organizations under decentralization. Additionally, NGOs contribute more resource ties relative to community associations or public organizations, and consistent with a crowding‐out dynamic, we find that this relationship is attenuated under decentralization. Our results suggest that administrative reforms can influence resource contributing behavior by organizations and the structure of inter‐organizational networks, which are important but underemphasized mechanisms potentially linking decentralization to service delivery outcomes. This is particularly relevant for policymakers working to support network governance for the joint production of public services in under‐resourced settings.

[1]  C. Weible,et al.  Building blocks of polycentric governance , 2023, Policy Studies Journal.

[2]  Cristian Pliscoff,et al.  A crowding-out of public values? Managerial vs. Weberian values in public sector reform in Latin America , 2022 .

[3]  Michael D. Siciliano,et al.  Network Structures and Network Effects Across Management and Policy Contexts: A Systematic Review , 2022, Public Administration.

[4]  Yixin Dai,et al.  Within the shadow of hierarchy: The role of hierarchical interventions in environmental collaborative governance , 2021, Governance.

[5]  Ricardo A. Bello‐Gomez.  Human Resources in Multilevel Service Provision Performance: The Role of Field Offices and Local Organizations , 2021, Review of Public Personnel Administration.

[6]  L. Rispel,et al.  Using social network analysis to examine inter-governmental relations in the implementation of the Ideal Clinic Realisation and Maintenance programme in two South African provinces , 2021, PloS one.

[7]  Krister P. Andersson,et al.  Decentralization Can Increase Cooperation among Public Officials , 2021 .

[8]  G. Robins,et al.  Reconciling Conflict and Cooperation in Environmental Governance: A Social Network Perspective , 2020, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[9]  J. Menken,et al.  Organizations matter in local governance: evidence from health sector decentralization in Honduras. , 2020, Health policy and planning.

[10]  Michael D. Siciliano,et al.  Mechanisms of Network Formation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2020 .

[11]  Rachel M. Krause,et al.  Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework , 2020 .

[12]  J. Menken,et al.  Assessing the impacts of governance reforms on health services delivery: a quasi-experimental, multi-method, and participatory approach , 2019, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

[13]  L. Maclean,et al.  Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism , 2019, World Development.

[14]  Conrado Ramos Larraburu.  The politics of bureaucracy: A view from Latin America , 2019, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

[15]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[16]  A. Milanesi,et al.  The neo-Weberian state and the neodevelopmentalist strategies in Latin America: the case of Uruguay , 2018, International Review of Administrative Sciences.

[17]  J. Nelson-Nuñez.  Substitution or Facilitation: Service-Delivery NGOs and Political Engagement in the Peruvian Amazon , 2018, Comparative Political Studies.

[18]  E. Sørensen,et al.  The democratizing impact of governance networks: From pluralization, via democratic anchorage, to interactive political leadership , 2018 .

[19]  Tiffany H. Morrison,et al.  Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals , 2017 .

[20]  Shahar Hameiri,et al.  International Intervention and Local Politics , 2017 .

[21]  D. Varda,et al.  Nonprofit Resource Contribution and Mission Alignment in Interorganizational, Cross-Sector Public Health Networks , 2017 .

[22]  T. Evans,et al.  Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Faguet,et al.  Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-Adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature , 2016 .

[24]  R. Feiock,et al.  Institutional Collective Action Issues in Nonprofit Self-Organized Collaboration , 2016 .

[25]  C. Bush,et al.  Exploring the Role of Dynamic Social Capital in Collaborative Governance , 2016 .

[26]  Jonathan K. Hanson.  Democracy and State Capacity: Complements or Substitutes? , 2015, Studies in Comparative International Development.

[27]  P. Leifeld,et al.  Structural and Institutional Determinants of Influence Reputation: A Comparison of Collaborative and Adversarial Policy Networks in Decision Making and Implementation , 2014 .

[28]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management , 2014 .

[29]  R. Feiock,et al.  The Roles of Regional Organizations for Interlocal Resource Exchange , 2014 .

[30]  Ramiro Berardo,et al.  Bridging and Bonding Capital in Two-Mode Collaboration Networks , 2014 .

[31]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  Caucuses in Collaborative Governance: Modeling the Effects of Structure, Power, and Problem Complexity , 2014 .

[32]  H. Park,et al.  The Politics of Connections: Assessing the Determinants of Social Structure in Policy Networks , 2014 .

[33]  R. Feiock.  The Institutional Collective Action Framework , 2013 .

[34]  Jill M. Purdy.  A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes , 2012 .

[35]  D. Varda.  A Network Perspective on State-Society Synergy to Increase Community-Level Social Capital , 2011 .

[36]  E. Lieberman.  The perils of polycentric governance of infectious disease in South Africa. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[37]  J. Faguet.  Decentralization and Governance , 2011 .

[38]  Melani Cammett,et al.  Introduction: the Political Consequences of Non-state Social Welfare in the Global South , 2011 .

[39]  M. Lubell,et al.  Collaborative Institutions in an Ecology of Games , 2010 .

[40]  S. Pandey,et al.  Interlocal Service Cooperation in U.S. Cities: A Social Network Explanation , 2010 .

[41]  J. Grand.  Knights and Knaves Return: Public Service Motivation and the Delivery of Public Services , 2010 .

[42]  C. Silvia,et al.  Does Leadership in Networks Matter? , 2009 .

[43]  Ingo Bode,et al.  Barriers to Co‐Governance: Examining the “Chemistry” of Home‐Care Networks in Germany, England, and Quebec , 2009 .

[44]  Thomas Schillemans,et al.  Accountability in the Shadow of Hierarchy: The Horizontal Accountability of Agencies , 2008 .

[45]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Do Networks Solve Collective Action Problems? Credibility, Search, and Collaboration , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[46]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective , 2008 .

[47]  R. Karl Rethemeyer,et al.  Network Management Reconsidered: An Inquiry into Management of Network Structures in Public Sector Service Provision , 2007 .

[48]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[49]  C. Poppelaars.  Resource Exchange in Urban Governance , 2007 .

[50]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[51]  Kun Huang,et al.  Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health services network , 2007 .

[52]  K. Provan,et al.  Resource tangibility and patterns of interaction in a publicly funded health and human services network , 2006 .

[53]  Robert Agranoff,et al.  Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers , 2006 .

[54]  John Gaventa,et al.  Finding the Spaces for Change: A Power Analysis , 2006 .

[55]  E. Swyngedouw.  Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State , 2005 .

[56]  K. O'neill.  Decentralization as an Electoral Strategy , 2003 .

[57]  Krister P. Andersson,et al.  What Motivates Municipal Governments? Uncovering the Institutional Incentives for Municipal Governance of Forest Resources in Bolivia , 2003 .

[58]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[59]  C. Huxham,et al.  Leadership In The Shaping And Implementation Of Collaboration Agendas: How Things Happen In A (Not Quite) Joined-Up World , 2000 .

[60]  Lars Carlsson,et al.  Policy Networks as Collective Action , 2000 .

[61]  A. Brooks.  Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both? , 2000 .

[62]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Governing the Hollow State , 2000 .

[63]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Crowding out Citizenship , 2000 .

[64]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks , 1999 .

[65]  F. Rojas,et al.  Beyond the center - decentralizing the State , 1999 .

[66]  T. Bossert.  Analyzing the decentralization of health systems in developing countries: decision space, innovation and performance. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[67]  J. Manor,et al.  Democracy and Decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, Accountability and Performance , 1998 .

[68]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance without government? Rethinking public administration , 1998 .

[69]  E. Ostrom.  A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997 , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[70]  E. Ostrom.  Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development , 1996 .

[71]  K. Provan,et al.  A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems , 1995 .

[72]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  How Intrinsic Motivation is Crowded out and in , 1994 .

[73]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Covenants with and without a Sword: Self-Governance Is Possible , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[74]  Kaare W. Strøm.  Democracy as Political Competition , 1992 .

[75]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[76]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[77]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  Amitai Etzioni.  The Third Sector and Domestic Missions , 1973 .

[80]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[81]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior as Exchange , 1958, American Journal of Sociology.

[82]  Krister P. Andersson,et al.  Public Sector Governance Reform and the Motivation of Street‐Level Bureaucrats in Developing Countries , 2019 .

[83]  Alej,et al.  Situation of the Health System in Honduras and the New Proposed Health Model , 2017 .

[84]  Heidi Jane M. Smith,et al.  Micro-Incentives and Municipal Behavior: Political Decentralization and Fiscal Federalism in Argentina and Mexico , 2016 .

[85]  L. Persha,et al.  Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes , 2014 .

[86]  C. Ansell,et al.  The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, Volume 17(1), 2012, article 7. Stewards, Mediators, and Catalysts: Toward a Model of Collaborative Leadership , 2022 .

[87]  J. Faguet.  Decentralization and Popular Democracy , 2012 .

[88]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  Why Do Agencies Work Together? The Determinants of Network Formation at the Subnational Level of Government in Thailand , 2010 .

[89]  J. L. Grand,et al.  Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy , 2003 .

[90]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program , 2003 .

[91]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economic Policy , 1998 .

[92]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: a Political-Economy Framework , 1989 .

[93]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Structural Sources of Intraorganizational: Power: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1984 .

[94]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .