An efficient method for reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty based on evidence theory and support vector regression

With a great capability of dealing with epistemic uncertainty, evidence theory has been utilised to conduct reliability analysis for engineering systems recently. Unfortunately, the discontinuous nature of uncertainty quantification using evidence theory incurs a huge computational cost. This paper proposes an efficient method to improve the computational efficiency of evidence theory for reliability analysis. In this method, evidence variables are transformed into random variables. Support vector regression is used to construct the approximation model of the limit-state function. The most probable point (MPP) of the approximate reliability problem with only random variables is searched out. Based on the MPP, the most probable focal element (MPFE) of the original problem with evidence variables is identified. According to the MPFE and the monotonicity of the limit-state function, contributions of some focal elements to belief and plausibility in evidence theory can be judged directly. Hence, the number of focal elements involved in the calculation of extreme values of the limit-state function is reduced. Four numerical examples are utilised to test the performance of the proposed method. Results indicate that the proposed method can reduce the computational cost on reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty while ensuring the high accuracy of reliability analysis results.

[1]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[2]  F. O. Hoffman,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  New light on first- and second-order reliability methods , 1987 .

[4]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis With Probability and Evidence Theories , 2006, DAC 2006.

[5]  George J. Klir,et al.  Uncertainty-Based Information , 1999 .

[6]  Xiaoqian Chen,et al.  A reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization procedure based on combined probability and evidence theory , 2013 .

[7]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis with Mixture of Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties , 2007 .

[8]  Zhenzhong Chen,et al.  An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization , 2013 .

[9]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  An approximation approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses , 2003, DAC 2003.

[11]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Methodology for Managing the Effect of Uncertainty in Simulation-Based Design , 2000 .

[13]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[14]  David J. Wagg,et al.  ASME 2007 International design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference , 2007 .

[15]  Kari Sentz,et al.  Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2002 .

[16]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Investigation of Evidence Theory for Engineering Applications , 2002 .

[17]  Michel van Tooren,et al.  Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles , 2011 .

[18]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence , 1994 .

[19]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Epistemic uncertainty quantification techniques including evidence theory for large-scale structures , 2004 .

[20]  G. Klir,et al.  Uncertainty-based information: Elements of generalized information theory (studies in fuzziness and soft computing). , 1998 .

[21]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  A Second-Order Reliability Method With First-Order Efficiency , 2010 .

[22]  Hid N. Grouni,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 1986 .

[23]  W. Dong,et al.  Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables , 1987 .

[24]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[25]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[26]  Jun Zhou,et al.  A Design Optimization Method Using Evidence Theory , 2005, DAC 2005.

[27]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Convex models of uncertainty in applied mechanics , 1990 .

[28]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[29]  Kathleen V. Diegert,et al.  Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Nonprobabilistic, convex-theoretic modeling of scatter in material properties , 1994 .

[31]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Uncertainty quantification using evidence theory in multidisciplinary design optimization , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[32]  Xu Han,et al.  A novel evidence-theory-based reliability analysis method for structures with epistemic uncertainty , 2013 .

[33]  Antonio Harrison Sánchez,et al.  Limit state function identification using Support Vector Machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains , 2008 .

[34]  Xiaoping Du Unified Uncertainty Analysis by the First Order Reliability Method , 2008 .