Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions

[1]  A. Chandio,et al.  Towards sustainable food production: What role ICT and technological development can play for cereal production in Asian-7 countries? , 2022, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[2]  R. Kousar,et al.  Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[3]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[4]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Impact of fossil fuels and renewable energy consumption on economic growth in Paris Club Countries , 2022, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy.

[5]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[6]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Abundance of natural resources and environmental sustainability: the roles of manufacturing value-added, urbanization, and permanent cropland , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  M. Usman,et al.  Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Linking nuclear energy, human development and carbon emission in BRICS region: Do external debt and financial globalization protect the environment? , 2022, Nuclear Engineering and Technology.

[9]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[10]  M. Usman,et al.  What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development , 2021 .

[11]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[12]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Is clean energy prosperity and technological innovation rapidly mitigating sustainable energy-development deficit in selected sub-Saharan Africa? A myth or reality , 2021 .

[13]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Investigating the nexus between CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and pilgrimage tourism in Saudi Arabia , 2021, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[14]  F. Bekun,et al.  Beyond the environmental Kuznets Curve in E7 economies: Accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables , 2021 .

[15]  F. Bekun,et al.  Exploring the role of conventional energy consumption on environmental quality in Brazil: Evidence from cointegration and conditional causality , 2021 .

[16]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Renewable and Non-renewable Energy Policy Simulations for abating emissions in a complex economy: Evidence from the Novel Dynamic ARDL , 2021 .

[17]  B. Ramdani,et al.  The effects of environmental innovations on CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Europe , 2021, Environmental Science & Policy.

[18]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  The criticality of information and communication technology and human capital in environmental sustainability: Evidence from Latin American and Caribbean countries , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  M. Usman,et al.  Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries , 2021 .

[20]  F. Bekun.  Mitigating Emissions in India: Accounting for the Role of Real Income, Renewable Energy Consumption and Investment in Energy , 2021 .

[21]  M. Usman,et al.  Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  F. Bekun,et al.  Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in BRICS. , 2020, Resources Policy.

[23]  Danish,et al.  Analyzing the relationship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Danish,et al.  The role of natural resources abundance and dependence in achieving environmental sustainability: Evidence from resource‐based economies , 2020 .

[25]  Sofien Tiba,et al.  The pollution concern in the era of globalization: Do the contribution of foreign direct investment and trade openness matter? , 2020 .

[26]  F. Bekun,et al.  Natural resource, globalization, urbanization, human capital, and environmental degradation in Latin American and Caribbean countries , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[27]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Renewable energy and environmental quality: A second-generation panel evidence from the Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) Countries. , 2020, Environmental research.

[29]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? , 2020 .

[30]  S. Nathaniel,et al.  The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries , 2020 .

[31]  Désiré Avom,et al.  ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[32]  M. Pesaran.  General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels , 2020 .

[33]  Cheong-Fatt Ng,et al.  Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: asymmetry analysis and robust estimation under cross-section dependence , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[34]  Danish,et al.  Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization , 2020 .

[35]  Anwar Khan,et al.  Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  M. Destek,et al.  Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[37]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: Formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[38]  Fateh Bélaïd,et al.  Renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption, environmental degradation and economic development: Evidence from Mediterranean countries , 2019, Energy Policy.

[39]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States , 2019, Resources Policy.

[40]  Kerui Du,et al.  Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[41]  Oumarou Zallé.  Natural resources and economic growth in Africa: The role of institutional quality and human capital , 2019, Resources Policy.

[42]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[43]  Kunming Li,et al.  How population and energy price affect China's environmental pollution? , 2019, Energy Policy.

[44]  J. Inekwe,et al.  R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014 , 2019, Energy Economics.

[45]  F. Ganda.  The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Toward a sustainable environment: Nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  Hossein-Ali Fakher.  Investigating the determinant factors of environmental quality (based on ecological carbon footprint index) , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[48]  S. Hassan,et al.  Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: evidence from Pakistan , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[49]  Caner Demir,et al.  Income inequality and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from Turkey , 2018, Energy & Environment.

[50]  The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018 , 2018, The Sustainable Development Goals Report.

[51]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[52]  Sakiru Adebola Solarin,et al.  Influence of foreign direct investment on indicators of environmental degradation , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[53]  M. Meo,et al.  Asymmetric impact of oil prices, exchange rate, and inflation on tourism demand in Pakistan: new evidence from nonlinear ARDL , 2018 .

[54]  Matheus Koengkan.  The decline of environmental degradation by renewable energy consumption in the MERCOSUR countries: an approach with ARDL modeling , 2018, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[55]  Danish,et al.  Dynamic linkages between road transport energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental quality: evidence from Pakistan , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[56]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? , 2018 .

[57]  Anis Omri.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Entrepreneurship, sectoral outputs and environmental improvement: International evidence , 2022 .

[58]  A. C. Marques,et al.  Are renewable energy policies upsetting carbon dioxide emissions? The case of Latin America countries , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[59]  K. Sohag,et al.  Sectoral output, energy use, and CO2 emission in middle-income countries , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[60]  Rashid Nikzad,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and green technologies in Canada , 2017 .

[61]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Energy Innovation in the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC): A Theoretical Approach , 2017 .

[62]  W. Sparber,et al.  Financing Innovations for the Renewable Energy Transition in Europe , 2016 .

[63]  Abdul Qayyum Khan,et al.  Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries , 2016 .

[64]  Nathan S. Lewis,et al.  Aspects of science and technology in support of legal and policy frameworks associated with a global carbon emissions-control regime , 2016 .

[65]  Dierk Herzer,et al.  The long-run effect of foreign direct investment on total factor productivity in developing countries: a panel cointegration analysis , 2018 .

[66]  Ishmael Ackah,et al.  Green growth in oil producing African countries: A panel data analysis of renewable energy demand , 2015 .

[67]  D. Cohen,et al.  Health and Education: Another Look with the Proper Data , 2014 .

[68]  B. Baltagi,et al.  A Lagrange Multiplier test for cross-sectional dependence in a fixed effects panel data model , 2012 .

[69]  E. Dumitrescu,et al.  Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels , 2012 .

[70]  R. Barro,et al.  A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950-2010 , 2010 .

[71]  I. Wing,et al.  Accounting for quality: Issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies ☆ , 2008 .

[72]  A. Ullah,et al.  A Bias-Adjusted LM Test of Error Cross-Section Independence , 2008 .

[73]  T. Foxon,et al.  Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime , 2008 .

[74]  J. Westerlund.  Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data , 2006 .

[75]  Samarjit Das,et al.  Panel unit root tests under cross‐sectional dependence , 2005 .

[76]  M. Pesaran.  A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[77]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[78]  Thorvaldur Gylfason,et al.  Natural Resources and Economic Growth: The Role of Investment , 2001 .

[79]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[80]  S. D. Bruyn,et al.  Explaining the environmental Kuznets curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions , 1997, Environment and Development Economics.

[81]  M. Turner,et al.  How Increasing CO2 and Climate Change Affect Forests , 1990 .

[82]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .