Filamentary switching: synaptic plasticity through device volatility.

Replicating the computational functionalities and performances of the brain remains one of the biggest challenges for the future of information and communication technologies. Such an ambitious goal requires research efforts from the architecture level to the basic device level (i.e., investigating the opportunities offered by emerging nanotechnologies to build such systems). Nanodevices, or, more precisely, memory or memristive devices, have been proposed for the implementation of synaptic functions, offering the required features and integration in a single component. In this paper, we demonstrate that the basic physics involved in the filamentary switching of electrochemical metallization cells can reproduce important biological synaptic functions that are key mechanisms for information processing and storage. The transition from short- to long-term plasticity has been reported as a direct consequence of filament growth (i.e., increased conductance) in filamentary memory devices. In this paper, we show that a more complex filament shape, such as dendritic paths of variable density and width, can permit the short- and long-term processes to be controlled independently. Our solid-state device is strongly analogous to biological synapses, as indicated by the interpretation of the results from the framework of a phenomenological model developed for biological synapses. We describe a single memristive element containing a rich panel of features, which will be of benefit to future neuromorphic hardware systems.

[1]  Shinhyun Choi,et al.  Comprehensive physical model of dynamic resistive switching in an oxide memristor. , 2014, ACS nano.

[2]  Jan van den Hurk,et al.  Nanobatteries in redox-based resistive switches require extension of memristor theory , 2013, Nature Communications.

[3]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[4]  G. Collingridge,et al.  Long-term depression in the CNS , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Andrew S. Cassidy,et al.  A million spiking-neuron integrated circuit with a scalable communication network and interface , 2014, Science.

[6]  M. Kozicki,et al.  Electrochemical metallization memories—fundamentals, applications, prospects , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[7]  Bob Liang,et al.  Recognition, Mining and Synthesis , 2005 .

[8]  Byoungil Lee,et al.  Nanoelectronic programmable synapses based on phase change materials for brain-inspired computing. , 2012, Nano letters.

[9]  Dmitri B. Strukov,et al.  Nanotechnology: Smart connections , 2011, Nature.

[10]  D. Stewart,et al.  The missing memristor found , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[12]  Masakazu Aono,et al.  On-demand nanodevice with electrical and neuromorphic multifunction realized by local ion migration. , 2012, ACS nano.

[13]  A. Thomas,et al.  The Memristive Magnetic Tunnel Junction as a Nanoscopic Synapse‐Neuron System , 2012, Advanced materials.

[14]  Fabien Alibart,et al.  Pattern classification by memristive crossbar circuits using ex situ and in situ training , 2013, Nature Communications.

[15]  H. Markram,et al.  Potential for multiple mechanisms, phenomena and algorithms for synaptic plasticity at single synapses , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[16]  Fei Zeng,et al.  Learning processes modulated by the interface effects in a Ti/conducting polymer/Ti resistive switching cell , 2014 .

[17]  W. Regehr,et al.  Short-term synaptic plasticity. , 2002, Annual review of physiology.

[18]  Vivek Subramanian,et al.  A Detailed Study of the Forming Stage of an Electrochemical Resistive Switching Memory by KMC Simulation , 2011, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[19]  Wei Yang Lu,et al.  Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. , 2010, Nano letters.

[20]  K. Roy,et al.  Spin-Based Neuron Model With Domain-Wall Magnets as Synapse , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[21]  T. Hasegawa,et al.  Short-term plasticity and long-term potentiation mimicked in single inorganic synapses. , 2011, Nature materials.

[22]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Fabien Alibart,et al.  A Memristive Nanoparticle/Organic Hybrid Synapstor for Neuroinspired Computing , 2011, ArXiv.

[24]  Alex Ming Shen,et al.  A Carbon Nanotube Synapse with Dynamic Logic and Learning , 2013, Advanced materials.

[25]  C. Gamrat,et al.  An Organic Nanoparticle Transistor Behaving as a Biological Spiking Synapse , 2009, 0907.2540.

[26]  Frederick T. Chen,et al.  Formation and instability of silver nanofilament in Ag-based programmable metallization cells. , 2010, ACS nano.

[27]  Qing Wan,et al.  Artificial synapse network on inorganic proton conductor for neuromorphic systems. , 2014, Nature communications.

[28]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Gearing,et al.  Correction: Corrigendum: Tonic inhibition in dentate gyrus impairs long-term potentiation and memory in an Alzheimer’s disease model , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  M. Pickett,et al.  A scalable neuristor built with Mott memristors. , 2013, Nature materials.

[31]  Rylan Kautz,et al.  Two‐Terminal Protonic Devices with Synaptic‐Like Short‐Term Depression and Device Memory , 2014, Advanced materials.

[32]  Kyoobin Lee,et al.  Synaptic behaviors of a single metal–oxide–metal resistive device , 2011 .

[33]  J. D. McGaugh Memory--a century of consolidation. , 2000, Science.

[34]  D. Ielmini,et al.  Study of Multilevel Programming in Programmable Metallization Cell (PMC) Memory , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.