Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic

Abstract The present paper develops a methodology based on fuzzy logic for post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage. It derives the global building damage level from that reported information by trained technical staff, after in-situ visual inspection of the main parameters, i.e., the “Structural components” and the “Non-structural components”. For illustration purposes, thousands of evaluation forms from post-earthquake survey following the 2003 Boumerdes, Algeria, earthquake (Mw = 6.8) have been collected. According to the standard evaluation form, each component’s damage is ranked from D1 (No damage) up to D5 (Collapse). The aim is then to derive the global damage level of buildings which should also rank from D1 to D5. The paper investigates the effect of the number and weights of fuzzy rules to relate each components’ damage level to the global damage level using a single-antecedent weighted fuzzy rule. It investigates also the effect of membership functions values so that it is possible to consider one damage level as the most dominant with highest membership value whereas the rest damage levels are still considered although with lower influence. A genetic algorithm is adopted to optimize the rule weights associated to the components’ damage levels. The collected database which covers more than 27,000 buildings is used to train and validate the procedure. The theoretical prediction, obtained by automatic processing of the evaluation form for each building, is compared to the global damage (observed damage) identified by inspectors. Results show that the theoretically-based evaluation is in accordance with the observed values for 90% of the investigated buildings.

[1]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Response‐based damage assessment of structures , 1999 .

[2]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Post-quake structural damage evaluation by neural networks: theory and calibration , 2019 .

[3]  Stephanos E. Dritsos,et al.  First-Level Pre-earthquake Assessment of Buildings Using Fuzzy Logic , 2006 .

[4]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Seismic Analysisand Design of Nonstructural Elements , 2004 .

[5]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[8]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  Expert system methodologies and applications - a decade review from 1995 to 2004 , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Joseph M. Bracci,et al.  Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering , 2003 .

[10]  Zekâi Sen Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Rudolf Kruse,et al.  How the learning of rule weights affects the interpretability of fuzzy systems , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[12]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[13]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Effect of rule weights in fuzzy rule-based classification systems , 2000, Ninth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. FUZZ- IEEE 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37063).

[14]  Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms , 1993, Robust Control Systems with Genetic Algorithms.

[15]  Thomas A. Runkler,et al.  Selection of appropriate defuzzification methods using application specific properties , 1997, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Seismic risk and damage prediction: case of the buildings in Constantine city (Algeria) , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[17]  Peter Jackson,et al.  Introduction to expert systems , 1986 .

[18]  M. L. Carreño,et al.  Computational Tool for Post-Earthquake Evaluation of Damage in Buildings , 2010 .

[19]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[20]  E. H. Mamdani,et al.  An Experiment in Linguistic Synthesis with a Fuzzy Logic Controller , 1999, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[21]  Taucer Fabio,et al.  Field Manual for Post-Earthquake Damage and Safety Assessment and Short Term Countermeasures (AeDES) , 2007 .

[22]  Robert Hooke,et al.  `` Direct Search'' Solution of Numerical and Statistical Problems , 1961, JACM.

[23]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[24]  Mauricio Sa´nchez‐Silva,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[25]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Seismic vulnerability: theory and application to Algerian buildings , 2014, Journal of Seismology.

[26]  K. C. Stylianidis,et al.  Computer-Aided Pre- and Post-Earthquake Assessment of Buildings Involving Database Compilation, GIS Visualization, and Mobile Data Transmission , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[27]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[28]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 1997 .

[29]  Etienne E. Kerre,et al.  Defuzzification: criteria and classification , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Base Modeling , 2010 .

[31]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Selecting fuzzy if-then rules for classification problems using genetic algorithms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..