Morphing structures and fatigue: The case of an unmanned aerial vehicle wing leading edge

With the emergence of novel aircraft structural concepts, which make use of large-scale shape deflections to achieve improved flight performance across significantly different flight regimes and missions, unusual crack paths and mixed-mode crack propagation situations may take place. Consequently, morphing concepts require a full understanding of the materials' behaviour in primary or secondary structures to reliably withstand unusual and demanding operating conditions. A case study of a morphing leading edge developed for the wings of an unmanned aerial vehicle is presented in this paper. Leading edges are subjected to damage originated by bird strike or other events, and those damages can compromise the structural integrity and stability of the flight. Due to the deflections during the morphing structure actuation, cracks will propagate eventually until critical sizes. Possible crack propagation scenarios are presented, considering the service operation of the morphing leading edge.

[1]  Ronald Krueger,et al.  The Virtual Crack Closure Technique : History , Approach and Applications , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Modeling and Flight Control of Large-Scale Morphing Aircraft , 2007 .

[3]  M. Kabir,et al.  Extended finite element fracture analysis of a cracked isotropic shell repaired by composite patch , 2016 .

[4]  A Wildschek,et al.  An all-composite, all-electric, morphing trailing edge device for flight control on a blended-wing-body airliner , 2010 .

[5]  R. Pecora,et al.  Airfoil Structural Morphing Based on S.M.A. Actuator Series: Numerical and Experimental Studies , 2011 .

[6]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The design of a coated composite corrugated skin for the camber morphing airfoil , 2015 .

[7]  A. P. Berens,et al.  Analysis and Support Initiative for Structural Technology (ASIST) Delivery Order 0016: USAF Damage Tolerant Design Handbook: Guidelines For the Analysis and Design of Damage Tolerant Aircraft Structures , 2002 .

[8]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Fracture analysis of composite co-cured structural joints using decohesion elements , 2008 .

[9]  Dan D. Vicroy,et al.  Perspectives on Highly Adaptive or Morphing Aircraft , 2009 .

[10]  Amir Reza Shahani,et al.  Finite element simulation of dynamic crack propagation process using an arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation , 2013 .

[11]  Sergio Ricci,et al.  Design, Manufacturing and Preliminary Test Results of an Adaptive Wing Camber Model , 2006 .

[12]  Jonathan D. Bartley-Cho,et al.  Development of High-rate, Adaptive Trailing Edge Control Surface for the Smart Wing Phase 2 Wind Tunnel Model , 2004 .

[13]  Aidy Ali,et al.  Modelling the fatigue crack growth in friction stir welded joint of 2024-T351 Al alloy , 2009 .

[14]  Hans Peter Monner,et al.  DESIGN OF A SMART LEADING EDGE DEVICE FOR LOW SPEED WIND TUNNEL TESTS IN THE EUROPEAN PROJECT SADE , 2011 .

[15]  Simon Barter,et al.  Aspects of fatigue affecting the design and maintenance of modern military aircraft , 1993 .

[16]  Ephrahim Garcia,et al.  Morphing unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[17]  Holger Hanselka,et al.  Development and design of flexible Fowler flaps for an adaptive wing , 1998, Smart Structures.

[18]  Yinji Ma,et al.  Prediction on fatigue life of U‐notched PMMA plate , 2017 .

[19]  D. Radaj.  Extended Stress Intensity Factor Concepts , 2013 .

[20]  Yanju Liu,et al.  Morphing aircraft based on smart materials and structures: A state-of-the-art review , 2016 .

[21]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Development and Testing of a Span-Extending Morphing Wing , 2011 .

[22]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Design and Fabrication of a Passive 1D Morphing Aircraft Skin , 2010 .

[23]  Rhys Jones,et al.  Fatigue crack growth and damage tolerance , 2014 .

[24]  Michael Rose,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLIANTMECHANISM FOR AN UAV LEADING EDGE , 2015 .

[25]  P.M.S.T. de Castro,et al.  An overview of fatigue in aircraft structures , 2017 .

[26]  A. Pasta,et al.  A model for predicting the mixed-mode fatigue crack growth in a bonded joint , 2014 .

[27]  Melanie Perera,et al.  Optimal Design of a Seamless Aeroelastic Wing Structure , 2009 .

[28]  John Yen,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Shape Memory Alloy Actuated Reconfigurable Airfoil , 2003 .

[29]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The mechanics of composite corrugated structures: A review with applications in morphing aircraft , 2015 .

[30]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  The application of residual stress tailoring of snap-through composites for variable sweep wings , 2006 .

[31]  Kevin A. Snook,et al.  縦方向電界場中で曲げたPIN-PMN-PT単結晶の強度 , 2011 .

[32]  Kristiina Oksman,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Composites from Poly Lactic Acid (PLA) and Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC) , 2005 .

[33]  J. Bressan,et al.  Anti‐symmetrical curved composite laminate subject to delamination induced by thermal cycling , 2017 .

[34]  P. Moreira,et al.  Characterization of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate of AA6056 T651 and T6: Application to Predict Fatigue Behaviour of Stiffened Panels , 2010 .

[35]  Zafer Gürdal,et al.  Mechanism for Warp-Controlled Twist of a Morphing Wing , 2010 .

[36]  Jaap Schijve,et al.  Fatigue damage in aircraft structures, not wanted, but tolerated? , 2009 .

[37]  G. McKnight,et al.  Segmented Reinforcement Variable Stiffness Materials for Reconfigurable Surfaces , 2010 .

[38]  Afzal Suleman,et al.  Aero-structural Design Optimization of a Morphing Wingtip , 2011 .

[39]  Melanie Perera,et al.  Structural and Dynamic Analysis of a Seamless Aeroelastic Wing , 2010 .