Improving the response of a wheel speed sensor by using frequency-domain adaptive filtering

In this paper, a frequency-domain least-mean-square adaptive filter is used to cancel noise in a wheel speed sensor embedded in a car under performance tests. In this case the relevant signal is buried in a broad-band noise background, where we have little or no prior knowledge of the signal or noise characteristics. The results of the experiments show that the signal of interest and the noise (all forms of interference, deterministic, as well as stochastic) share the same frequency band and that the filter used significantly reduced the noise corrupting the information from the sensor while it left the true signal unchanged from a practical point of view. In this paper, a signal-to-noise ratio improvement higher than 40 dB is achieved. The results of the experiment show the importance of using digital signal processing when dealing with a signal corrupted by noise.

[1]  G. Zames Feedback and optimal sensitivity: Model reference transformations, multiplicative seminorms, and approximate inverses , 1981 .

[2]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  A view of three decades of linear filtering theory , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  B. Widrow,et al.  Adaptive noise cancelling: Principles and applications , 1975 .

[4]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series, with Engineering Applications , 1949 .

[5]  E. Ferrara Fast implementations of LMS adaptive filters , 1980 .

[6]  Wilmar Hernández Improving the response of an accelerometer by using optimal filtering , 2001 .

[7]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[8]  Wilmar Hernandez,et al.  Improving the Responses of Several Accelerometers Used in a Car Under Performance Tests by Using Kalman Filtering , 2001 .

[9]  Sanjit K. Mitra,et al.  Block implementation of adaptive digital filters , 1981 .

[10]  J. Shynk Frequency-domain and multirate adaptive filtering , 1992, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  S. Mitra,et al.  A unified approach to time- and frequency-domain realization of FIR adaptive digital filters , 1983 .

[12]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Adaptive filter theory (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[13]  Peter Elgar,et al.  Sensors for Measurement and Control , 1998 .

[14]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Adaptive Signal Processing , 1985 .

[15]  H. W. Bode,et al.  A Simplified Derivation of Linear Least Square Smoothing and Prediction Theory , 1950, Proceedings of the IRE.

[16]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  B. Anderson,et al.  Optimal Filtering , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  G. Zames,et al.  Feedback, minimax sensitivity, and optimal robustness , 1983 .

[19]  H. Sorenson Least-squares estimation: from Gauss to Kalman , 1970, IEEE Spectrum.

[20]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[21]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[22]  Ali H. Sayed,et al.  H∞ optimality of the LMS algorithm , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..