The effects of interview focus on recruitment effectiveness : a field experiment

This study investigated the impact of interview focus (i.e., combined recruitment-selection versus recruitment only), interview content, and individual differences on applicants' information acquisition during interviews and persistence in pursuing jobs. Applicants for a position in a research center were studied longitudinally in a randomized experimental design. Results indicated that applicants acquired more information from interviews focusing solely on recruitment. This effect was strength-ened where applicants were low in cognitive ability, high in trait anxiety, and low in self-monitoring. However, applicants involved in combined recruitment-selection interviews were more likely to persist in pursuing the job. The implications of these results for recruiting practice are described

[1]  Robert M. Guion,et al.  Personnel assessment, selection, and placement. , 1991 .

[2]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  The Employment Interview: Theory, Research, and Practice , 1989 .

[3]  S. Rynes.  The Employment Interview as a Recruitment Device , 1988 .

[4]  J. Taylor,et al.  A personality scale of manifest anxiety. , 1953, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  Michael M. Harris.  RECONSIDERING THE EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: A REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1989 .

[6]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. , 1991 .

[7]  M. Miceli.  Why Realistic Job Previews Cannot Meet Our Unrealistically High Expectations. , 1983 .

[8]  John P. Wanous,et al.  INSTALLING A REALISTIC JOB PREVIEW: TEN TOUGH CHOICES , 1989 .

[9]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition , 1989 .

[10]  K. Murphy.  Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[11]  Patricia M. Fandt,et al.  The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically , 1990 .

[12]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  A Process investigation of realistic job previews: Mediating variables and channels of communication , 1990 .

[13]  G. Powell.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO THE INITIAL EMPLOYMENT INTERVIEW: EXPLORING THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES , 1991 .

[14]  A. Jensen,et al.  g: Artifact or reality? , 1986 .

[15]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Organizational entry : recruitment, selection, and socialization of newcomers , 1982 .

[16]  S. Rynes,et al.  Applicant Attraction Strategies: An Organizational Perspective , 1990 .

[17]  D. Watson,et al.  Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  F. Schmidt.  The Problem of Group Differences in Ability Test Scores in Employment Selection , 1988 .

[19]  P. Ackerman.  A correlational analysis of skill specificity: Learning, abilities, and individual differences. , 1990 .

[20]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Negative affectivity as the underlying cause of correlations between stressors and strains. , 1991, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[22]  M J Burke,et al.  Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[24]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  Recruitment science and practice , 1992 .

[25]  R. J. Summers,et al.  Job alternatives and job choice , 1991 .

[26]  John P. Wanous,et al.  A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. , 1985 .

[27]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Category and word search: generalizing search principles to complex processing. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  S. Rynes.  Recruitment, Job Choice, and Post-Hire Consequences: A Call For New Research Directions , 1989 .

[29]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[30]  H. Garland,et al.  Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Leader Emergence Across Two Task Situations. , 1979 .

[31]  S. Rynes.  Compensation Strategies for Recruiting , 1987 .

[32]  M. Snyder.  Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring , 1986 .

[33]  P. Ackerman.  Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[34]  Thomas W. Dougherty,et al.  Influences of Campus Recruiting on Applicant Attraction to Firms , 1992 .

[35]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring , 1982 .

[36]  P. Ackerman.  Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  James E. Campion,et al.  The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research. , 1982 .

[38]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[39]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[40]  P. Ackerman.  Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[41]  L. Gottfredson,et al.  Validity versus Utility of Mental Tests: Example of the SAT. , 1986 .

[42]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  The Effects of Realistic Job Previews on Applicant Self-Selection and Employee Turnover, Satisfaction, and Coping Ability , 1986 .

[43]  R. Baron.  Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior pattern and self-monitoring☆ , 1989 .

[44]  Robert L. Kahn,et al.  Stress in organizations. , 1992 .

[45]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. , 1992 .