The national innovation system in the Taiwanese photovoltaic industry: A multiple stakeholder perspective

With the shortage in fossil energy and the increasing demand for renewable energy sources, the solar energy, or photovoltaic (PV), industry has flourished. The main purpose of this paper is to integrate and extend a multiple stakeholder perspective and the National Innovation System (NIS) to decipher the convergence and strategic dynamics among the innovation networks of the PV industry. Data are collected through a survey of multiple stakeholders, including government, industry experts, scholars and silicon wafer and solar cell firms. Building upon a multiple stakeholder perspective, we identify the behaviors of stakeholders and construct a strategic network based on their interests in order to understand the evolution and potential transition trends of the PV industry. As a result, our empirical studies show that the silicon wafer and solar cell industries are highly dependent on the silicon supplies of companies abroad, while major stakeholders spontaneously converge in non-government stakeholder network rather than that in government-led network. The paper demonstrates that studying stakeholder networks enables us to identify the dynamics and interactions of stakeholders in the development of the PV industry. That is, the empirical results not only provide an overview of innovation activities within the widely accepted NIS landscape, but also identify key success factors influencing the successful development of the PV industry. The implications of the study enable us to reevaluate the relationship between stakeholders and the NIS with respect to the development of industrial innovation policies.

[1]  R. Roberts,et al.  Stakeholder Conceptions of the Corporation: Their Meaning and Influence in Accounting Research , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[2]  J. Mathews.  A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan's Semiconductor Industry , 1997 .

[3]  J. Sheppard,et al.  A Resource Dependence Approach To Organizational Failure , 1995 .

[4]  Hwa Meei Liou,et al.  Policies and legislation driving Taiwan's development of renewable energy , 2010 .

[5]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[6]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[8]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[9]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[10]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[11]  Kumiko Miyazaki,et al.  An integrated network approach to systems of innovation--the case of robotics in Japan , 1999 .

[12]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[13]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[14]  Michel Godet,et al.  The Art of Scenarios and Strategic Planning - Tools and Pitfalls , 2000 .

[15]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective , 2003 .

[16]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[17]  Jung-Hua Wu,et al.  Technological system and renewable energy policy: A case study of solar photovoltaic in Taiwan , 2007 .

[18]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[19]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[20]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[22]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited" , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[23]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Distributed Innovation Systems and Instituted Economic Processes , 2000 .

[24]  R. Brugha,et al.  Stakeholder analysis: a review. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[25]  Martin J. Smith,et al.  Pressure, power, and policy : state autonomy and policy networks in Britain and the United States , 1993 .

[26]  C. Edquist.  Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries , 2013 .

[27]  Louis Galambos,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Vaccine Development at Merck, Sharp and Dohme, and Mulford, 1895-1995 , 1995 .

[28]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[29]  Y. Fassin,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Tweekerkenstraat 2 B-9000 Gent the Stakeholder Model Refined , 2022 .

[30]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[31]  R. Wade.  Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[32]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[33]  David P. Dolowitz,et al.  Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature , 1996 .

[34]  Fengchao Liu,et al.  A regional perspective on the structural transformation of China's national innovation system since 1999 , 2010 .

[35]  J. K. Benson.  The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy , 1975 .

[36]  Hwa Meei Liou,et al.  Overview of the photovoltaic technology status and perspective in Taiwan , 2010 .

[37]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  K. Cook.  Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations , 1976 .

[39]  R. Grimble,et al.  Trees and trade-offs: a stakeholder approach to natural resource management , 1995 .