Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective

Information technology has played a remarkably important role in developing the contemporary educational system. It not only provides easy access to enormous stores of information but also increases students' scientific efficiency. However, the availability of this technology has also led to increased plagiarism. This study attempted to explore how access to Internet technology contributes to plagiarism problems from the perspective of university students in Iran. A qualitative method to semistructured interviews with 20 students suggested important themes: uncertainty avoidance, tendency to use shortcuts to progress, symbolic certification, social learning and modeling of faculty members as mentors, and plagiarism in the name of justice. Survey data from 180 university students suggest that the personality characteristic of conscientiousness had a negative effect on using information technology to commit plagiarism.

[1]  Sandra Turner,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Digital Cheating and Plagiarism Among Middle School Students , 2007 .

[2]  Rosemary Talab,et al.  Copyright and you , 2004 .

[3]  Lucy McKeever.  Online plagiarism detection services—saviour or scourge? , 2006 .

[4]  Miguel Roig,et al.  Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors , 2001 .

[5]  Dana Loewy,et al.  Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism , 2007 .

[6]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[7]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[8]  David A. Mackey,et al.  Deterring research paper plagiarism with technology: Establishing a department-level electronic research paper database with e-mail , 2005 .

[9]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Contested texts: issues of plagiarism , 2001 .

[10]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[11]  J. M. Digman.  PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[12]  E. Peña,et al.  Academic crime and punishment: Faculty members' perceptions of and responses to plagiarism. , 2005 .

[13]  L. Frederiksen,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT , 1981 .

[14]  Chris J. Park,et al.  Rebels without a clause: towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students , 2004 .

[15]  R. M. Schell.  Organizational Behavior Management , 1998 .

[16]  Roger Bennett,et al.  Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university , 2005 .

[17]  Ellen Krupar,et al.  Mouse Click Plagiarism: The Role of Technology in Plagiarism and the Librarian's Role in Combating It , 2001, Libr. Trends.

[18]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[19]  B. Whitley,et al.  Academic Integrity as an Institutional Issue , 2001 .

[20]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation , 1997 .

[21]  R. Bhagat.  Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[22]  Marcia Devlin,et al.  Policy, Preparation, and Prevention: Proactive minimization of student plagiarism , 2006 .

[23]  Gale M. Lucas,et al.  Individual Differences in Workplace Deviance and Integrity as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty , 2005 .