Power exchange for frequency control (PXFC)

This paper concerns markets for balancing power supply and demand in real-time. Two qualitatively different market mechanisms are of interest: (1) primary electricity market(s) for supplying anticipated demand, and (2) a frequency control market for ensuring that system frequency remains within prespecified limits as demand deviates in real-time from its anticipated pattern. We suggest that both types of markets are necessary for ensuring that frequency remains within its technically acceptable limits as power is provided competitively. In particular, we develop one possible structure of a power exchange for frequency control (PXFC) that ensures frequency quality in a general primary electricity market comprising both bilateral and spot sub-markets.

[1]  C. Nichols Techniques in Handling Load-Regulating Problems on Interconnected Power Systems [includes discussion] , 1953, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  F. Schweppe,et al.  Real Time Pricing to Assist in Load Frequency Control , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  L. H. Fink,et al.  Understanding automatic generation control , 1992 .

[4]  Marija D. Ilic,et al.  Minimal system regulation and its value in a changing industry , 1996, Proceeding of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications IEEE International Conference on Control Applications held together with IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Contro.

[5]  H. F. Illian,et al.  Control performance criteria , 1996 .

[6]  B. Kirby,et al.  Creating competitive markets for ancillary services , 1997 .

[7]  B. H. Bakken,et al.  Automatic generation control in a deregulated power system , 1998 .

[8]  Lester H. Fink,et al.  New Control Paradigms for Deregulation , 1998 .

[9]  Frank C. Graves,et al.  One-Part Markets for Electric Power: Ensuring the Benefits of Competition , 1998 .

[10]  Harry Singh Auctions for ancillary services , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..