Length‐mass models for some common New Zealand littoral‐benthic macroinvertebrates, with a note on within‐taxon variability in parameter values among published models

Abstract Regression models are developed and presented to predict dry mass (mg) from two linear dimensions (mm) for 17 benthic macroinvertebrate taxa common to littoral zones of New Zealand lakes. We also provide regression models to predict body length from head capsule width for the major insect taxa. Dry mass was best explained as a power function of all linear dimensions: M = aL b .Parameters are presented in the log10‐transformed linear form of this power function. Body length was a simple linear function of head capsule width for all insect taxa, hence parameters for these models are presented as untransformed values. We also provide family level models for the Chironomidae, and compare our chironomid body length‐mass model with other published Chrionomidae length‐mass models. There was a very high degree of variability in parameter values among published length‐mass models for the family Chironomidae (mean coefficient of variation for mass at length = 148%). We discuss the potential causes and implications of this variability.

[1]  A. Huryn,et al.  Length-Mass Relationships for Freshwater Macroinvertebrates in North America with Particular Reference to the Southeastern United States , 1999, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[2]  T. A. Johnston,et al.  Dry mass–length relationships for benthic insects: a review with new data from Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada , 1999 .

[3]  M. James,et al.  Macroinvertebrate distribution in the littoral zone of Lake Coleridge, South Island, New Zealand—effects of habitat stability, wind exposure, and macrophytes , 1998 .

[4]  J. Downing,et al.  Density-body size relationships in local aquatic communities , 1997 .

[5]  C. Veltman,et al.  Predicting dry weight of New Zealand aquatic macroinvertebrates from linear dimensions , 1994 .

[6]  E. Meyer,et al.  The relationship between body length parameters and dry mass in running water invertebrates , 1989, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[7]  B. Heise,et al.  Production of Hexagenia limbata (Serville) and Ephemera simulans Walker (Ephemeroptera) in Dauphin Lake, Manitoba, with a Note on Weight Loss due to Preservatives , 1988 .

[8]  R. Leuven,et al.  Effects of preservation on dry- and ash-free dry weight biomass of some common aquatic macro-invertebrates , 1985, Hydrobiologia.

[9]  B. Timms Benthic macro in vertebrates of seven lakes near Cass, Canterbury high country, New Zealand , 1983 .

[10]  L. A. Smock Relationships between body size and biomass of aquatic insects , 1980 .

[11]  Peter Burgherr,et al.  Regression analysis of linear body dimensions vs. dry mass in stream macroinvertebrates , 1997 .

[12]  M. Futter,et al.  Changes in body dimensions of larval Chaoborus in ethanol and formalin , 1994 .

[13]  Y. Prairie,et al.  Practical guidelines for the use of zooplankton length-weight regression equations , 1985 .

[14]  M. Winterbourn,et al.  Guide to the aquatic insects of New Zealand. 3rd edition. , 1981 .

[15]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .