Optimal control-based online motion planning for cooperative lane changes of connected and automated vehicles

This work formulates the multi-vehicle lane change motion planning task as a centralized optimal control problem, which is beneficial in being generic and complete. However, a direct solution to this optimal control problem is numerically intractable due to the dimensionality of the collision-avoidance constraints and nonlinearity of the vehicle kinematics. A progressively constrained dynamic optimization (PCDO) method is proposed to facilitate the numerical solving process of this complicated problem. PCDO guarantees to efficiently obtain an optimum to the original optimal control problem via solving a sequence of simplified problems which gradually judge and reserve only the active collision-avoidance constraints. A first-regularization-then-action strategy, together with the look-up table technique, is developed for online solutions. At the regularization stage, the vehicles form a standard formation by linear acceleration/deceleration only. At the action stage, the vehicles execute lane change motions computed offline and recorded in the look-up table. This makes online motion planning feasible because 1) the computational complexity at the regularization stage scales linearly rather than exponentially with the vehicle number; and 2) online computation at the action stage is fully avoided through data extraction from the look-up table.

[1]  Pu Li,et al.  Nonlinear programming for multi-vehicle motion planning with homotopy initialization strategies , 2017, 2017 13th IEEE Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[2]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Simultaneous versus joint computing: A case study of multi-vehicle parking motion planning , 2017, J. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Andreas A. Malikopoulos,et al.  A Survey on the Coordination of Connected and Automated Vehicles at Intersections and Merging at Highway On-Ramps , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  F. Borrelli,et al.  MILP and NLP Techniques for centralized trajectory planning of multiple unmanned air vehicles , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[5]  Fang Zhou,et al.  Parsimonious shooting heuristic for trajectory control of connected automated traffic part I: Theoretical analysis with generalized time geography , 2015, ArXiv.

[6]  Kevin Heaslip,et al.  Minimizing the Disruption of Traffic Flow of Automated Vehicles During Lane Changes , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[7]  Keqiang Li,et al.  Lane changing intention recognition based on speech recognition models , 2016 .

[8]  Seyed Mostafa Safdarnejad,et al.  Initialization strategies for optimization of dynamic systems , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[9]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Spatio-temporal decomposition: a knowledge-based initialization strategy for parallel parking motion optimization , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[10]  Karsten Lemmer,et al.  Cooperative Maneuver Planning for Cooperative Driving , 2016, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[11]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  Aircraft trajectory planning with collision avoidance using mixed integer linear programming , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[12]  Ece Guran Schmidt,et al.  Lane Change Scheduling for Autonomous Vehicles , 2016 .

[13]  Tao Mei,et al.  Lane change path planning based on piecewise Bezier curve for autonomous vehicle , 2013, Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[14]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Cooperative Motion Planning for Multiple Autonomous Marine Vehicles , 2012 .

[15]  Hong Liu,et al.  Centralized and optimal motion planning for large-scale AGV systems: A generic approach , 2017, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[16]  Mo Chen,et al.  Safe sequential path planning of multi-vehicle systems via double-obstacle Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs variational inequality , 2014, 2015 European Control Conference (ECC).

[17]  Christos Katrakazas,et al.  Real-time motion planning methods for autonomous on-road driving: State-of-the-art and future research directions , 2015 .