Systematic review of economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery

Objective To carry out a systematic review of the literature relating to economic aspects of alternative modes of delivery.

[1]  R. Goeree,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour versus serial antenatal monitoring in the Canadian Multicentre Postterm Pregnancy Trial. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[2]  D. Oberer,et al.  Best practice: clinical pathways for uncomplicated births. , 1996, Best practices and benchmarking in healthcare : a practical journal for clinical and management application.

[3]  A. Macario,et al.  Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section , 1995 .

[4]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Health after childbirth , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  S. Singh,et al.  Paying for maternity care in the United States. , 1987, Family planning perspectives.

[6]  E. Love,et al.  Incidence of hospital-acquired infections associated with caesarean section. , 1995, The Journal of hospital infection.

[7]  Elina Hemminki,et al.  Long-term effects of cesarean sections: Ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  A. Shorten,et al.  Trial of labour versus elective repeat caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1998, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[9]  T O Jefferson,et al.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ , 1996, BMJ.

[10]  R. Newman,et al.  Cost-effective delivery management of the vertex and nonvertex twin gestation. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  D. Rouse,et al.  Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis. , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  L. Burns,et al.  The effect of physician practice organization on efficient utilization of hospital resources. , 1994, Health services research.

[13]  M. Koopmanschap,et al.  Indirect costs in economic studies: confronting the confusion. , 1993, PharmacoEconomics.

[14]  C. Betley,et al.  Effects of maternity-stay legislation on 'drive-through deliveries'. , 1998, Health affairs.

[15]  J. Spencer,et al.  Delivery following previous caesarean section , 1991 .

[16]  A. Peaceman,et al.  Maternal hospital charges associated with trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section. , 1998, Birth.

[17]  T. H. Strong,et al.  Experience with early postcesarean hospital dismissal. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  R. Stafford.  Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates , 1990 .

[19]  S. Finkler,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Early Hospital Discharge and Home Follow-Up of Women Having Cesarean Birth , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  E. Hillan,et al.  Postoperative morbidity following Caesarean delivery. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[21]  A. Scott.  A cost analysis of early discharge and domiciliary visits versus standard hospital care for low-risk obstetric clients. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[22]  V. Fuchs,et al.  Expenditures for reproduction-related health care. , 1986, JAMA.

[23]  D. Anderson,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of home birth. , 1999, Journal of nurse-midwifery.

[24]  R M Elashoff,et al.  Hospital- and patient-related characteristics determining maternity length of stay: a hierarchical linear model approach. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[25]  N. Fisk,et al.  Survey of obstetricians' personal preference and discretionary practice. , 1997, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[26]  A. Elixhauser,et al.  Assessment of costs and benefits of management of gestational diabetes mellitus. , 1998, Diabetes care.

[27]  B. Sachs,et al.  The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  L. Burns,et al.  Hospital utilization and mortality levels for patients in the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System. , 1993, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[29]  M. Blegen,et al.  Outcomes of Hospital‐Based Managed Care: A Multivariate Analysis of Cost and Quality , 1995, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  G. S. Gordon,et al.  Charges for comprehensive obstetric care at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. A comparison. , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[31]  R. Goeree,et al.  Induction of labour versus expectant management for prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: an economic evaluation. TERMPROM Study Group. Term Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[32]  L. Subak,et al.  Analgesia after Cesarean Delivery: Patient Evaluations and Costs of Five Opioid Techniques , 1991, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[33]  A. T. Sumner,et al.  The cost of poor birth outcomes in employer-sponsored health plans. , 1996, Medical care.

[34]  P. Thomassen,et al.  Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth , 1997, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[35]  I. Mackenzie,et al.  Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: 2. Analysis of cost , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[36]  B. Backe,et al.  Societal costs of antenatal and obstetrical care , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[37]  J. Eisenach,et al.  Determination of an effective dose of intrathecal morphine for pain relief after cesarean delivery. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[38]  V. Hundley,et al.  Costs of intrapartum care in a midwife-managed delivery unit and a consultant-led labour ward. , 1995, Midwifery.

[39]  R. Laros,et al.  Management of term breech presentation. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  R. Lilford,et al.  The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre‐existing physiological disturbances , 1990, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[41]  J. Fortney,et al.  Efficacy of external cephalic version: A review , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[42]  D. Rouse,et al.  The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound. , 1996, JAMA.

[43]  A. Macfarlane.  At last—maternity statistics for England , 1998, BMJ.

[44]  V. Durkalski,et al.  Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  M. Mugford,et al.  Economic evaluation of early amniotomy in low risk women , 1998 .

[46]  U. Gerdtham,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Variation in Cesarean Section Rates: A Cross-sectional Study of 59 Obstetrical Departments in Sweden , 1998, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[47]  E M Wall,et al.  Trial of labor or repeated cesarean section. The woman's choice. , 1997, Archives of family medicine.

[48]  A. Macario,et al.  Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Comparison of Time Efficiency, Costs, Charges, and Complications , 1995, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[49]  M. Mugford,et al.  How does the mode of delivery affect the cost of maternity care? , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[50]  R. Johanson,et al.  Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[51]  D. S. Morrison,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Induction of Labor: Safety and Efficacy , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[52]  I. Mackenzie.  Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them? , 1999, BMJ.