Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design

The development and implementation of language teaching programs can be approached in several different ways, each of which has different implications for curriculum design. Three curriculum approaches are described and compared. Each differs with respect to when issues related to input, process, and outcomes, are addressed. Forward design starts with syllabus planning, moves to methodology, and is followed by assessment of learning outcomes. Resolving issues of syllabus content and sequencing are essential starting points with forward design, which has been the major tradition in language curriculum development. Central design begins with classroom processes and methodology. Issues of syllabus and learning outcomes are not specified in detail in advance and are addressed as the curriculum is implemented. Many of the ‘innovative methods’ of the 1980s and 90s reflect central design. Backward design starts from a specification of learning outcomes and decisions on methodology and syllabus are developed from the learning outcomes. The Common European Framework of Reference is a recent example of backward design. Examples will be given to suggest how the distinction between forward, central and backward design can clarify the nature of issues and trends that have emerged in language teaching in recent years.

[1]  Scott Thornbury,et al.  Teaching Unplugged: Dogme in English Language Teaching , 2009 .

[2]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  Action-based Teaching, Autonomy and Identity , 2007 .

[3]  William F. Mackey,et al.  Language Teaching Analysis , 1968 .

[4]  H. Taba,et al.  Curriculum development; theory and practice , 1962 .

[5]  G. Broughton.  The Threshold Level for Modern Language Learning in Schools , 1980 .

[6]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education , 2009 .

[7]  S. Krashen,et al.  The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom , 1983 .

[8]  L. V. Lier.  The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective , 2004 .

[9]  K. Graves.  The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective , 2008, Language Teaching.

[10]  D. Wilkins,et al.  Communicative Syllabus Design , 1980 .

[11]  N. S. Prabhu,et al.  Second Language Pedagogy , 1987 .

[12]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching , 2012 .

[13]  Clive S. Langham,et al.  Communicative language testing - an attainable goal ? , 2000 .

[14]  Constant Leung,et al.  Outcomes-based language teaching , 2012 .

[15]  Roland Hindmarsh,et al.  Cambridge English Lexicon , 1980 .

[16]  J. Asher.  Learning Another Language Through Actions , 1993 .

[17]  吉島 茂,et al.  文化と言語の多様性の中のCommon European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR)--それは基準か? (第10回明海大学大学院応用言語学研究科セミナー 講演) , 2008 .

[18]  Robert Keith Johnson,et al.  The Second Language Curriculum: Index , 1989 .

[19]  Anne-Marie Barrault-Méthy.  The Common European Framework of Reference: The Globalisation of Language Education Policy , 2013 .

[20]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[21]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching , 2001 .

[22]  Sonsoles Sánchez-Reyes Peñamaría.  The Common European Framework of Reference , 2011 .

[23]  J. A. van Ek.  The Threshold-Level in a Unit/Credit System. , 1973 .

[24]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[25]  B. Kumaravadivelu.  The Postmethod Condition: (E) merging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching , 1994 .

[26]  Kris van den Branden.  Task-Based Language Education: References , 2006 .

[27]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning , 2004 .

[28]  Helen Basturkmen,et al.  Developing Courses in English for Specific Purposes , 2010 .

[29]  William F. Mackey,et al.  Language Teaching Analysis , 1974 .

[30]  Christine C. M. Goh,et al.  Teaching Speaking: A Holistic Approach , 2012 .

[31]  Martin Tessmer,et al.  A layers-of-necessity instructional development model , 1990 .

[32]  L. Stenhouse.  An introduction to curriculum research and development , 1975 .

[33]  Ralph W. Tyler,et al.  Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction , 1969 .

[34]  J. Bruner.  The Process of Education , 1960 .

[35]  Albert Sydney Hornby,et al.  Guide to Patterns and Usage in English , 1954 .

[36]  Penny McKay,et al.  On ESL standards for school-age learners , 2000 .

[37]  Peeter Mehisto,et al.  Uncovering CLIL : content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education , 2008 .

[38]  Sandra Lee McKay.  On Notional Syllabuses. , 1980 .

[39]  Michael A. West,et al.  A general service list of English words, with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word-list for the writing of popular science and technology , 1953 .

[40]  Hans-Eberhard Piepho,et al.  A communicative syllabus design , 1980 .

[41]  Jane Willis,et al.  A Framework for Task-Based Learning , 1996 .

[42]  John L. D. Clark,et al.  Curriculum Renewal in School Foreign Language Learning , 1987 .

[43]  Caleb Gattegno,et al.  Teaching Foreign Languages in Schools The Silent Way , 1974 .

[44]  M. Pennington,et al.  Reorienting the teaching universe: the experience of five first-year English teachers in Hong Kong , 1997 .

[45]  Randi Reppen,et al.  Using Corpora in the Language Classroom , 2010 .

[46]  Charles Arthur Curran,et al.  Counseling-learning in second languages , 1976 .

[47]  Richard Berwick,et al.  The Second Language Curriculum: Needs assessment in language programming: from theory to practice , 1989 .

[48]  Jan Ate van Ek,et al.  The threshold level for modern language learning in schools , 1978 .