Efficient GRAPPA reconstruction using random projection

As a data-driven technique, GRAPPA has been widely used for parallel MRI reconstruction. In GRAPPA, a large amount of calibration data is desirable for accurate calibration and thus estimation. However, the computational time increases with the large number of equations to be solved, which is especially serious in 3-D reconstruction. To address this issue, a number of approaches have been developed to compress the large number of physical channels to fewer virtual channels. In this paper, we tackle the complexity problem from a different prospective. We propose to use random projections to reduce the dimension of the problem in the calibration step. Experimental results show that randomly projecting the data onto a lower-dimensional subspace yields results comparable to those of traditional GRAPPA, but is computationally significantly less expensive.

[1]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Array compression for MRI with large coil arrays , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Dimitris Achlioptas,et al.  Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins , 2003, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[4]  W. B. Johnson,et al.  Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into Hilbert space , 1984 .

[5]  Wei Lin,et al.  A hybrid method for more efficient channel‐by‐channel reconstruction with many channels , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Santosh S. Vempala,et al.  An algorithmic theory of learning: Robust concepts and random projection , 1999, Machine Learning.

[7]  Mariya Doneva,et al.  Automatic coil selection for channel reduction in SENSE-based parallel imaging , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[8]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Parallel MRI Using Phased Array Coils , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Christina Triantafyllou,et al.  A 128‐channel receive‐only cardiac coil for highly accelerated cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Samuel Kaski,et al.  Dimensionality reduction by random mapping: fast similarity computation for clustering , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36227).

[11]  Scott B King,et al.  Optimum SNR data compression in hardware using an Eigencoil array , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Yudong Zhu,et al.  Efficient large-array k-domain parallel MRI using channel-by-channel array reduction. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  Stefan Skare,et al.  Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data‐driven parallel imaging methods , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Yu Li,et al.  A software channel compression technique for faster reconstruction with many channels. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .