Evaluating Componentized Enterprise Information Technologies: A Multiattribute Modeling Approach

Corporations are increasingly implementing enterprise information technologies (EITs), because of the costs of maintaining legacy systems and the lack of fit of such systems for organization-wide information sharing. A new type of EIT that is being introduced in major corporations (such as Dell Computers), is based on the idea of component systems, which are stand-alone software programs that can integrate with other such components with relative ease. Given the financial outlay for EITs, the evaluation and adoption of these systems is not something that can be completed haphazardly. This requirement is complicated by the relative infancy of models for the evaluation of componentized EITs. To this end, in this paper, we introduce a managerial multistage multiattribute decision model, consisting of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model and the Supermatrix approach (also defined as the Analytical Network Processes (ANP) approach). This combination of models builds on earlier work that validates the Supermatrix approach for evaluating traditional EITs at a Fortune 100 organization. The aggregation of these benefits is then measured against the costs of systems, thereby arriving at a ranking of alternatives for each functional area. We illustrate the model with an example and draw managerial implications.

[1]  David Sprott,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: componentizing the enterprise application packages , 2000, CACM.

[2]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[3]  Alexander E. Ellinger,et al.  Supplier Selection Decisions In Systems/Software Purchases , 1997 .

[4]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Hanifa Shah,et al.  Technical Opinion: Viewpoints on legacy systems , 1999, CACM.

[6]  David Sprott,et al.  Componentizing the Enterprise Application Packages. , 2000 .

[7]  Jane Mallor,et al.  Are business papers safe from the government , 1977 .

[8]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Software Growth Options , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[10]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  A method for the identification of reusable units through the reengineering of legacy code , 1998, J. Syst. Softw..

[11]  Steven Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Han van Dissel,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: ERP system migrations , 2000, CACM.

[13]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  Capability Maturity Model for Software , 2001 .

[14]  Bijoy Bordoloi,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Relationship between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Perry A Trunick ERP -- PROMISE OR PIPE DREAM? , 1999 .

[16]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[17]  Paul Robertson,et al.  Integrating legacy systems with modern corporate applications , 1997, CACM.

[18]  Munirpallam A. Venkataramanan,et al.  Capturing group preferences in a multicriteria decision , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  R. Sundarraj,et al.  Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies , 2000 .

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Software Development Practices, Software Complexity, and Software Maintenance Performance: a Field Study , 1998 .

[21]  Craig A. Knoblock,et al.  Query reformulation for dynamic information integration , 1996, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[22]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: introduction , 2000, CACM.

[23]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Debugging and the experience of immediacy , 1997, CACM.

[24]  DevarajSarv,et al.  Information technology payoff in the health-care industry , 2000 .

[25]  Donald H. Liles,et al.  The Development of Strategic Performance Metrics , 1995 .

[26]  Emily C. Plachy,et al.  Enterprise Solutions Structure , 1999, IBM Syst. J..

[27]  Chang-Soo Lee,et al.  Design of a Software Component Bank for Distribution , 2001, J. Syst. Integr..

[28]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Tom Renkema Boekbespreking Farbey, B.; Land, F.; Targett, D.: how to assess your IT investment, a study of methods and practice (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1993) , 1994 .

[30]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice , 1990 .

[31]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Capital budgeting in information systems development , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Edmond P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding “IS business value”: derivation of dimensions , 1999 .

[33]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Dynamic Business Models as a Basis for Interoperable Transaction Design , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[35]  Maryellen R. Kelley,et al.  Productivity and Information Technology: The Elusive Connection , 1994 .

[36]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[37]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[38]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[39]  Michael Tow Cheung,et al.  Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[40]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[41]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A Decision Model for Strategic Evaluation of Enterprise Information Technologies , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[42]  Michael Tow Cheung,et al.  Internet-based e-shopping and consumer attitudes: an empirical study , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation , 1999 .

[44]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[45]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  The adoption and design methodologies of component-based enterprise systems , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[47]  S. Wheelwright Reflecting corporate strategy in manufacturing decisions , 1978 .

[48]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  Satya N. Prattipati,et al.  Information systems variables and management productivity , 1997, Information Manager (The).

[50]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[52]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Services Function , 1994 .

[53]  David S. Hinley,et al.  Software evolution management: a process-oriented perspective , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[54]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[55]  Han van Dissel,et al.  ERP System Migrations. , 2000 .

[56]  L. Lawrence Ho Interoperable Distributed Management , 2004, Journal of Network and Systems Management.

[57]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  A multi-period optimization model for the procurement of component-based enterprise information technologies , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  W. Doll,et al.  The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work , 1999 .

[60]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Managing Software Productivity and Reuse , 1999, Computer.

[61]  Galen C. Hunt,et al.  Component-Based APIs for Versioning and Distributed Applications , 1999, Computer.

[62]  Peter H. Aiken,et al.  DoD legacy systems: reverse engineering data requirements , 1994, CACM.

[63]  David Garlan,et al.  Formal modeling of the Enterprise JavaBeans(TM) component integration framework , 2001, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[64]  Z. Irani,et al.  Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process , 1997 .

[65]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[66]  Juergen Henn IBM San Francisco - Object-oriented infrastructure and reusable business components for distributed, multi-platform business applications - implemented entirely in Java , 1998, Softw. Concepts Tools.

[67]  Leonor Barroca,et al.  Enterprise frameworks for workflow management systems , 2002, Softw. Pract. Exp..

[68]  Alfred Taudes,et al.  Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions: A Case Study , 2000, MIS Q..

[69]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[70]  Juergen Henn IBMSan Francisco , 1998 .

[71]  Lawrence Markosian,et al.  Using an enabling technology to reengineer legacy systems , 1994, CACM.

[72]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Mauri Laitinen,et al.  Thinking Objectively: The problem with scalability , 2000, CACM.

[74]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Web-HIPRE - Global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis , 1999 .

[75]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[76]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .