Conflict Resolution in Mobile Networks: A Self-Coordination Framework Based on Non-Dominated Solutions and Machine Learning for Data Analytics [Application Notes]

Self-organizing network (SON) is a well-known term used to describe an autonomous cellular network. SON functionalities aim at improving network operational tasks through the capability to configure, optimize and heal itself. However, as the deployment of independent SON functions increases, the number of dependencies between them also grows. This work proposes a tool for efficient conflict resolution based on network performance predictions. Unlike other state-of-theart solutions, the proposed self-coordination framework guarantees the right selection of network operation even if conflicting SON functions are running in parallel. This self-coordination is based on the history of network measurements, which helps to optimize conflicting objectives with low computational complexity. To do this, machine learning (ML) is used to build a predictive model, and then we solve the SON conflict by optimizing more than one objective function simultaneously. Without loss of generality, we present an analysis of how the proposed scheme provides a solution to deal with the potential conflicts between two of the most important SON functions in the context of mobility, namely mobility load balancing (MLB) and mobility robustness optimization (MRO), which require the updating of the same set of handover parameters. The proposed scheme allows fast performance evaluations when the optimization is running. This is done by shifting the complexity to the creation of a prediction model that uses historical data and that allows to anticipate the network performance. The simulation results demonstrate the ability of the proposed scheme to find a compromise among conflicting actions, and show it is possible to improve the overall system throughput.

[1]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[2]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  Predicting QoS in LTE HetNets based on location-independent UE measurements , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modelling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[3]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[4]  Ovidiu Iacoboaiea,et al.  SON Coordination for parameter conflict resolution: A reinforcement learning framework , 2014, 2014 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW).

[5]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[6]  Raphael Romeikat,et al.  An Experimental System for SON Function Coordination , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[7]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  The gesture recognition toolkit , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Lorenza Giupponi,et al.  Self-coordination of parameter conflicts in D-SON architectures: a Markov decision process framework , 2015, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[9]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  A Mobile Network Planning Tool Based on Data Analytics , 2017, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[10]  You Li,et al.  Difference-Based Joint Parameter Configuration for MRO and MLB , 2012, 2012 IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[11]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  Big Data Empowered Self Organized Networks , 2014 .

[12]  Ann Nowé,et al.  Multi-objective reinforcement learning using sets of pareto dominating policies , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  G. Smits,et al.  Estimation of the regularization parameter for support vector regression , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN'02 (Cat. No.02CH37290).

[14]  Josep Mangues-Bafalluy,et al.  On the potential of ensemble regression techniques for future mobile network planning , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC).

[15]  Csaba Szepesvári,et al.  Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning , 2010, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[16]  Kristina Zetterberg,et al.  On design principles for self-organizing network functions , 2014, 2014 11th International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS).

[17]  Thomas G. Dietterich.  An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and Randomization , 2000, Machine Learning.

[18]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[19]  Raquel Barco,et al.  Load balancing and handover joint optimization in LTE networks using Fuzzy Logic and Reinforcement Learning , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[21]  Johan Johansson,et al.  Minimization of drive tests in 3GPP release 11 , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  Muhammad Ali Imran,et al.  Challenges in 5G: how to empower SON with big data for enabling 5G , 2014, IEEE Network.