Examining the Acquisition of Phonological Word Forms with Computational Experiments

It has been hypothesized that known words in the lexicon strengthen newly formed representations of novel words, resulting in words with dense neighborhoods being learned more quickly than words with sparse neighborhoods. Tests of this hypothesis in a connectionist network showed that words with dense neighborhoods were learned better than words with sparse neighborhoods when the network was exposed to the words all at once (Experiment 1), or gradually over time, like human word-learners (Experiment 2). This pattern was also observed despite variation in the availability of processing resources in the networks (Experiment 3). A learning advantage for words with sparse neighborhoods was observed only when the network was initially exposed to words with sparse neighborhoods and exposed to dense neighborhoods later in training (Experiment 4). The benefits of computational experiments for increasing our understanding of language processes and for the treatment of language processing disorders are discussed.

[1]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  H. Storkel,et al.  Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  Roberta Michnick Golinkoff,et al.  Becoming a word learner : a debate on lexical acquisition , 2000 .

[4]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Wallace E. Dixon Jr.,et al.  "Shhh! We're Tryin' to Concentrate": Attention and Environmental Distracters in Novel Word Learning , 2006, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[6]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Steve R. Howell,et al.  A Model of Grounded Language Acquisition: Sensorimotor Features Improve Lexical and Grammatical Learning. , 2005 .

[8]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  Acquiring the Mapping from Meaning to Sounds , 1994, Connect. Sci..

[9]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[10]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[12]  Linda B. Smith Learning How to Learn Words , 2000 .

[13]  M. Page,et al.  Connectionist modelling in psychology: A localist manifesto , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[15]  R. N. Indah Language and Speech , 1958, Nature.

[16]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Virtual Memories and Massive Generalization in Connectionist Combinatorial Learning ; CU-CS-431-89 , 1989 .

[17]  Michael Gasser,et al.  Learning Nouns and Adjectives: A Connectionist Account , 1998 .

[18]  James L. McClelland The Place of Modeling in Cognitive Science , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Melissa K. Stamer,et al.  Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language* , 2011, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[20]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[22]  David A. Balota,et al.  Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item Level , 1997 .

[23]  Terry Regier,et al.  The Emergence of Words: Attentional Learning in Form and Meaning , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  P. Luce,et al.  An examination of similarity neighbourhoods in young children's receptive vocabularies , 1995, Journal of Child Language.

[25]  S. Lewandowsky The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[26]  Holly L. Storkel,et al.  Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[27]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[28]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations , 1997 .

[29]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Studies in the Psychological Correlates of the Sound System of American English , 1964 .

[30]  S. Warren,et al.  Developmental language disorders : from phenotypes to etiologies , 2004 .

[31]  J. Siskind A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings , 1996, Cognition.

[32]  D. O'Neill,et al.  First Language , 2009 .

[33]  A. Samuel,et al.  Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural expectation: cerebellar and retinal analogs of cells fired by learnable or unlearned pattern classes , 2004, Kybernetik.

[35]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  A comparison of homonym and novel word learning: the role of phonotactic probability and word frequency , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[36]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[37]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[38]  S. Gathercole Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[39]  V. Marchman,et al.  Learning from a connectionist model of the acquisition of the English past tense , 1996, Cognition.

[40]  George Hollich,et al.  Lexical Neighborhood Effects in 17-Month-Old Word Learning , 2002 .

[41]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study , 1989 .

[42]  H. Storkel,et al.  The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[43]  Gordon D. A. Brown Connectionism, Phonology, Reading, and Regularity in Developmental Dyslexia , 1997, Brain and Language.

[44]  R. Aslin,et al.  Lexical competition in young children’s word learning , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Ping Li,et al.  Dynamic Self-Organization and Early Lexical Development in Children , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[47]  P. Luce,et al.  Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children's lexicons , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[48]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Differentiating word learning processes may yield new insights--a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's 'Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children'. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[49]  M. Vitevitch Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  H. Storkel,et al.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[51]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[52]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[53]  Chris Sinha,et al.  Symbol Grounding or the Emergence of Symbols? Vocabulary Growth in Children and a Connectionist Net , 1992 .

[54]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  The Lexicon and Phonology: Interactions in Language Acquisition. , 2002, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[55]  M. Vitevitch What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval? , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  Edward T. Auer,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics in Spoken Word Recognition , 2008 .

[57]  P. Luce,et al.  Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. , 2005 .

[58]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Large-Scale Modeling of Wordform Learning and Representation , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  An Emergentist Coalition Model for Word Learning , 2000 .

[60]  Chen Yu,et al.  The emergence of links between lexical acquisition and object categorization: a computational study , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[61]  Michael S. C. Thomas,et al.  Modeling language acquisition in atypical phenotypes. , 2003, Psychological review.