Metapopulation processes and persistence in remnant water vole populations

We examined the spatial distribution of water vole populations in four consecutive years and investigated whether the regional population processes of extinction, recolonisation and migration influence distribution and persistence. We examined how such regional processes are influenced by spatial variation in habitat quality. In addition, we assessed the relevance of metapopulation concepts for understanding the dynamics of species that deviate from classical metapopulation assumptions and developing conservation measures for them. Populations were patchy and discrete, and the patchy distribution was not static between years. Population turnover occurred even in the absence of predatory mink, which only influenced the network of populations at the end of the study. Most populations were clustered close together in the upper tributaries. Local population persistence was predominantly influenced by population size: large populations were more persistent. Recolonisation rates were influenced by isolation and habitat quality. The isolation estimates which best explained the distribution of water vole populations incorporated straight-line distances, suggesting water voles disperse overland. The distribution of recolonised sites indicated that dispersing voles actively selected habitat on the basis of its quality. Water voles depart from some of the assumptions made by frequently used metapopulation models. In particular there is no clear binary distinction between suitable and non-suitable habitat. Accounting for variation in habitat quality before investigating temporal changes in population distribution allowed us to demonstrate that the key metapopulation processes were important. The significance of regional population processes relative to local population processes may have increased in declining, fragmented populations compared to pristine regional populations. We hypothesise that although mink predation is likely to eventually cause regional extinction in many areas, metapopulation processes have delayed this decline. Consequently, conservation measures should take into account mink predation rates and regional population processes, before considering aspects of habitat quality.

[1]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Distribution of the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: Evidence for a Metapopulation Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[2]  D. Kehler,et al.  Effects of isolation on the occurrence of a fungivorous forest beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus, at different spatial scales in fragmented and continuous forests , 1999 .

[3]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[4]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[5]  D. Collett.  Modelling Binary Data , 1991 .

[6]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[7]  D. Hjermann,et al.  Landscape ecology of the wart-biter Decticus verrucivorus in a patchy landscape , 1996 .

[8]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Structured models of metapopulation dynamics , 1991 .

[9]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Minimum Viable Metapopulation Size , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[10]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1996 .

[11]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis , 1992 .

[12]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[13]  J. Aars,et al.  Water vole in the Scottish uplands: distribution patterns of disturbed and pristine populations ahead and behind the American mink invasion front , 2001 .

[14]  J. Lawton,et al.  HABITAT AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WATER VOLES: WHY ARE THERE GAPS IN A SPECIES' RANGE? , 1991 .

[15]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation and Extinction Thresholds in Spatially Explicit Models , 1996 .

[16]  J. Lawton,et al.  Patterns in the production of latrines by water voles (Arvicola terrestris) and their use as indices of abundance in population surveys , 1990 .

[17]  N. Yoccoz,et al.  Studying Transfer Processes in Metapopulations: Emigration, Migration, and Colonization , 1997 .

[18]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[19]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[20]  C. Thomas,et al.  The spatial structure of populations , 1999 .

[21]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics: From Concepts and Observations to Predictive Models , 1997 .

[22]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .

[23]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[24]  Anne Lohrli.  Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[26]  A. Hastings,et al.  Persistence of Transients in Spatially Structured Ecological Models , 1994, Science.