The impacts of built environment on home-based work and non-work trips: An empirical study from Iran

This paper aims to explore the impact of built environment attributes in the scale of one quarter-mile buffers on individuals’ travel behaviors in the metropolitan of Shiraz, Iran. In order to develop this topic, the present research is developed through the analysis of a dataset collected from residents of 22 neighborhoods with variety of land use features. Using household survey on daily activities, this study investigates home-based work and non-work (HBW and HBN) trips. Structural equation models are utilized to examine the relationships between land use attributes and travel behavior while taking into account socio-economic characteristics as the residential self-selection. Results from models indicate that individuals residing in areas with high residential and job density, and shorter distance to sub-centers are more interested in using transit and non-motorized modes. Moreover, residents of neighborhoods with mixed land uses tend to travel less by car and more by transit and non-motorized modes to non-work destinations. Nevertheless, the influences of design measurements such as street density and internal connectivity are mixed in our models. Although higher internal connectivity leads to more transit and non-motorized trips in HBW model, the impacts of design measurements on individuals travel behavior in HBN model are significantly in contrast with research hypothesis. Our study also shows the importance of individuals’ self-selection impacts on travel behaviors; individuals with special socio-demographic attributes live in the neighborhoods with regard to their transportation patterns. The findings of this paper reveal that the effects of built environment attributes on travel behavior in origins of trips do not exactly correspond with the expected predictions, when it comes in practice in a various study context. This study displays the necessity of regarding local conditions of urban areas and the inherent differences between travel destinations in integrating land use and transportation planning.

[1]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Life-style and travel demand , 2009 .

[2]  P. Gordon,et al.  Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal , 1997 .

[3]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Self-Selection in Home Choice , 2008 .

[4]  A. Soltani,et al.  The Influence of Urban Physical form on Trip Generation, Evidence from Metropolitan Shiraz, Iran , 2011 .

[5]  Yingling Fan,et al.  The built environment, activity space and time allocation : an activity-based framework for modeling the land use and travel connection , 2007 .

[6]  F. Witlox,et al.  Car availability explained by the structural relationships between lifestyles, residential location, and underlying residential and travel attitudes , 2014 .

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[8]  Michael N. Bagley,et al.  The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: A structural equations modeling approach , 2001 .

[9]  Andrew Allan,et al.  Analyzing the Impacts of Microscale Urban Attributes on Travel: Evidence from Suburban Adelaide, Australia , 2006 .

[10]  William H. Greene,et al.  School Location and Student Travel Analysis of Factors Affecting Mode Choice , 2004 .

[11]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Can we overcome automobile dependence?: Physical planning in an age of urban cynicism , 1995 .

[12]  C. Bhat,et al.  Assessing Impact of Urban Form Measures on Nonwork Trip Mode Choice After Controlling for Demographic and Level-of-Service Effects , 2003 .

[13]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[14]  Y. Chai,et al.  The impact of urban form on CO2 emission from work and non-work trips: The case of Beijing, China , 2015 .

[15]  L. Frank,et al.  Multiple Impacts of the Built Environment on Public Health: Walkable Places and the Exposure to Air Pollution , 2005 .

[16]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[17]  Colin Vance,et al.  The impact of urban form on automobile travel: disentangling causation from correlation , 2007 .

[18]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Neighborhood design and vehicle type choice: Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[19]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .

[20]  A. Duany.  Towns and town-making principles , 1991 .

[21]  Ole B. Jensen,et al.  Urban structure matters, even in a small town , 2004 .

[22]  João de Abreu e Silva,et al.  Using structural equations modeling to unravel the influence of land use patterns on travel behavior of workers in Montreal , 2012 .

[23]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[24]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  Exploring Causal Effects of Neighborhood Type on Walking Behavior Using Stratification on the Propensity Score , 2010 .

[25]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[26]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Linking urban transport and land use in developing countries , 2013 .

[27]  Phil. Goodwin,et al.  Three views on 'Peak Car' , 2012 .

[28]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Gasoline Consumption and Cities: A Comparison of U.S. Cities with a Global Survey , 1989 .

[29]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[30]  G. Giuliano.  The Weakening Transportation-Land Use Connection , 1995 .

[31]  G. Ridgeway,et al.  Neighborhood design and walking trips in ten U.S. metropolitan areas. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[32]  F. Witlox,et al.  Commuting trips within tours: how is commuting related to land use? , 2011 .

[33]  B. Wee.  Land use and transport: research and policy challenges , 2002 .

[34]  Jae-Su Lee,et al.  Built Environment Impacts on Individual Mode Choice: An Empirical Study of the Houston-Galveston Metropolitan Area , 2014 .

[35]  Donna Harrington,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2008 .

[36]  Michael J. Greenwald,et al.  Walking, Urban Design, and Health , 2008 .

[37]  B. Pushkarev,et al.  Public Transportation and Land Use Policy , 1977 .

[38]  B. Saelens,et al.  Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[39]  Daniel G. Chatman,et al.  How Density and Mixed Uses at the Workplace Affect Personal Commercial Travel and Commute Mode Choice , 2003 .

[40]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .

[41]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[42]  Ilan Salomon,et al.  How Derived is the Demand for Travel? Some Conceptual and Measurement Considerations , 2001 .

[43]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[44]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[45]  J. Sallis,et al.  Urban Form Relationships with Walk Trip Frequency and Distance among Youth , 2007, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[46]  L. Frank,et al.  Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice , 2007 .

[47]  Lothlorien S. Redmond,et al.  Understanding the Demand for Travel: It's Not Purely 'Derived' , 2001 .

[48]  Ming Zhang.  The Role of Land Use in Travel Mode Choice: Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong , 2004 .

[49]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[50]  P. Kanaroglou,et al.  Three decades of urban growth in the city of Shiraz, Iran: A remote sensing and geographic information systems application , 2011 .