Space-for-Time Substitution Works in Everglades Ecological Forecasting Models

Space-for-time substitution is often used in predictive models because long-term time-series data are not available. Critics of this method suggest factors other than the target driver may affect ecosystem response and could vary spatially, producing misleading results. Monitoring data from the Florida Everglades were used to test whether spatial data can be substituted for temporal data in forecasting models. Spatial models that predicted bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) population response to a drying event performed comparably and sometimes better than temporal models. Models worked best when results were not extrapolated beyond the range of variation encompassed by the original dataset. These results were compared to other studies to determine whether ecosystem features influence whether space-for-time substitution is feasible. Taken in the context of other studies, these results suggest space-for-time substitution may work best in ecosystems with low beta-diversity, high connectivity between sites, and small lag in organismal response to the driver variable.

[1]  Jon Norberg,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of metacommunities. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Recovery of topsoil characteristics after landslip erosion in dry hill country of New Zealand, and a test of the space-for-time hypothesis , 2003 .

[3]  Jana Verboom,et al.  Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: an analysis with a GIS based random walk model , 1996 .

[4]  N. S. Urquhart,et al.  Designs for Evaluating Local and Regional Scale Trends , 2001 .

[5]  Dolors Vaqué,et al.  Warming effects on marine microbial food web processes: how far can we go when it comes to predictions? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Experimental Policies for Water Management in the Everglades. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  The climate envelope may not be empty , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  A. Hamann,et al.  Bioclimate envelope model predictions for natural resource management: dealing with uncertainty , 2010 .

[9]  J. Trexler,et al.  Extinction‐colonization dynamics structure genetic variation of spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus) in the Florida Everglades , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[10]  L. Harris,et al.  Everglades: The Ecosystem and its Restoration. , 1995 .

[11]  E. Johnson,et al.  Testing the assumptions of chronosequences in succession. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[12]  J. Trexler,et al.  Temporal population genetic structure of eastern mosquitofish in a dynamic aquatic landscape. , 2011, The Journal of heredity.

[13]  J. Magnuson.  Long-Term Ecological Research and the Invisible Present , 1990 .

[14]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The incidence function approach to modeling of metapopulation dynamics , 1998 .

[15]  T. Brereton,et al.  Butterfly abundance in a warming climate: patterns in space and time are not congruent , 2011, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[16]  D. Gawlik.  THE EFFECTS OF PREY AVAILABILITY ON THE NUMERICAL RESPONSE OF WADING BIRDS , 2002 .

[17]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Monitoring ecosystems: interdisciplinary approaches for evaluating ecoregional initiatives , 2004 .

[18]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Grassland dynamics : long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie , 1998 .

[19]  M. Harmon,et al.  Ecological Variability in Space and Time: Insights Gained from the US LTER Program , 2003 .

[20]  A. Gimona,et al.  Opening the climate envelope reveals no macroscale associations with climate in European birds , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Steward T. A. Pickett,et al.  Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative to Long-Term Studies , 1989 .

[22]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[23]  J. Krebs,et al.  The bioclimatic envelope of the wolverine (Gulo gulo): do climatic constraints limit its geographic distribution? , 2010 .

[24]  O. Sala,et al.  Long-Term Forage Production of North American Shortgrass Steppe. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[25]  J. Trexler,et al.  Aquatic fauna as indicators for Everglades restoration: Applying dynamic targets in assessments , 2009 .

[26]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Preventing the collapse of the Baltic cod stock through an ecosystem-based management approach , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Soininen.  Species Turnover along Abiotic and Biotic Gradients: Patterns in Space Equal Patterns in Time? , 2010 .

[28]  J. Ogden,et al.  Factors Affecting Reproductive Success of Wading Birds (Ciconiiformes) in the Everglades Ecosystem , 1994 .

[29]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Studies in Ecology , 2012, Springer New York.

[30]  T. Dawson,et al.  Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? , 2003 .

[31]  J. Trexler,et al.  Sampling Fishes in Vegetated Habitats: Effects of Habitat Structure on Sampling Characteristics of the 1-m2 Throw Trap , 1997 .

[32]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. , 2001, Science.

[33]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  G. S. Ogato.  The Human Ecology of Wetlands in Least Developed Countries in Time of Climate Change: Policy and Strategy Implications for Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands , 2013 .

[35]  P. Haase,et al.  High spatial variability biases the space-for-time approach in environmental monitoring , 2010 .

[36]  M K Kaiser,et al.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  J. Trexler,et al.  Population dynamics of wetland fishes: spatio-temporal patterns synchronized by hydrological disturbance? , 2005 .