AI has generally interpreted the organized nature of everyday activity in terms of plan-following. Nobody could doubt that people often make and follow plans. But the complexity, uncertainty, and immediacy of the real world require a central role for moment-to-moment improvisation. But before and beneath any planning ahead, one continually decides what to do now. Investigation of the dynamics of everyday routine activity reveals important regularities in the interaction of very simple machinery with its environment. We have used our dynamic theories to design a program, called Pengi, that engages in complex, apparently planful activity without requiring explicit models of the world.
[1]
S. Ullman.
Visual routines
,
1984,
Cognition.
[2]
P. Agre.
The Structures of Everyday Life
,
1985
.
[3]
Leslie Pack Kaelbling,et al.
The Synthesis of Digital Machines With Provable Epistemic Properties
,
1986,
TARK.
[4]
David Chapman,et al.
Planning for Conjunctive Goals
,
1987,
Artif. Intell..
[5]
Philip E. Agre,et al.
ABSTRACT REASONING AS EMERGENT FROM CONCRETE ACTIVITY
,
1987
.
[6]
Philip E. Agre,et al.
The dynamic structure of everyday life
,
1988
.