Incorporating Synthetic Oligonucleotides via Gene Reassembly (ISOR): a versatile tool for generating targeted libraries.

The directed evolution of proteins has benefited greatly from site-specific methods of diversification such as saturation mutagenesis. These techniques target diversity to a number of chosen positions that are usually non-contiguous in the protein's primary structure. However, the number of targeted positions can be large, thus leading to impractically large library size, wherein almost all library variants are inactive and the likelihood of selecting desirable properties is extremely small. We describe a versatile combinatorial method for the partial diversification of large sets of residues. Our library oligonucleotides comprise randomized codons that are flanked by wild-type sequences. Adding these oligonucleotides to an assembly PCR of wild-type gene fragments incorporates the randomized cassettes, at their target sites, into the reassembled gene. Varying the oligonucleotides concentration resulted in library variants that carry a different average number of mutated positions that comprise a random subset of the entire set of diversified codons. This method, dubbed Incorporating Synthetic Oligos via Gene Reassembly (ISOR), was used to create libraries of a cytosine-C5 methyltransferase wherein 45 individual positions were randomized. One library, containing an average of 5.6 mutated residues per gene, was selected, and mutants with wild-type-like activities isolated. We also created libraries of serum paraoxonase PON1 harboring insertions and deletions (indels) in various areas surrounding the active site. Screening these libraries yielded a range of mutants with altered substrate specificities and indicated that certain regions of this enzyme have a surprisingly high tolerance to indels.

[1]  P. Hergenrother,et al.  Altering substrate specificity of phosphatidylcholine-preferring phospholipase C of Bacillus cereus by random mutagenesis of the headgroup binding site. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[2]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  W. Stemmer DNA shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: in vitro recombination for molecular evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  High-throughput screening of enzyme libraries: thiolactonases evolved by fluorescence-activated sorting of single cells in emulsion compartments. , 2005, Chemistry & biology.

[5]  Ryota Fujii,et al.  RAISE: a simple and novel method of generating random insertion and deletion mutations , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  Andrew D Griffiths,et al.  Directed evolution by in vitro compartmentalization , 2006, Nature Methods.

[7]  David Baker,et al.  Low free energy cost of very long loop insertions in proteins , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  S E Hufton,et al.  Building novel binding ligands to B7.1 and B7.2 based on human antibody single variable light chain domains. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Marco A Mena,et al.  Blue fluorescent proteins with enhanced brightness and photostability from a structurally targeted library , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Controlling the enantioselectivity of enzymes by directed evolution: practical and theoretical ramifications. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The 'evolvability' of promiscuous protein functions , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Assembly of Designed Oligonucleotides as an Efficient Method for Gene Recombination: A New Tool in Directed Evolution , 2003, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[13]  Cameron Neylon,et al.  Chemical and biochemical strategies for the randomization of protein encoding DNA sequences: library construction methods for directed evolution. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Wayne M Patrick,et al.  Strategies and computational tools for improving randomized protein libraries. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[15]  B. Dahiyat,et al.  Combining computational and experimental screening for rapid optimization of protein properties , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jon E. Ness,et al.  Synthetic shuffling expands functional protein diversity by allowing amino acids to recombine independently , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein , 2006, Nature.

[18]  J. Larrick,et al.  Antibody engineering by parsimonious mutagenesis. , 1993, Gene.

[19]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of the promiscuous esterase activity of carbonic anhydrase II. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[20]  Loren L Looger,et al.  Computational Design of a Biologically Active Enzyme , 2004, Science.

[21]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of an extremely fast phosphotriesterase by in vitro compartmentalization , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  J. Fastrez,et al.  Active TEM‐1 β‐lactamase mutants with random peptides inserted in three contiguous surface loops , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[23]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Protein building blocks preserved by recombination , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[24]  Manfred T. Reetz,et al.  Directed Evolution of an Enantioselective Enzyme through Combinatorial Multiple-Cassette Mutagenesis. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  Directed evolution of the site specificity of Cre recombinase , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Olga Khersonsky,et al.  Structure-reactivity studies of serum paraoxonase PON1 suggest that its native activity is lactonase. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[27]  Claes Gustafsson,et al.  Semi-synthetic DNA shuffling of aveC leads to improved industrial scale production of doramectin by Streptomyces avermitilis. , 2005, Metabolic engineering.

[28]  F. Arnold,et al.  Optimization of DNA shuffling for high fidelity recombination. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[29]  Andreas Vogel,et al.  Expanding the range of substrate acceptance of enzymes: combinatorial active-site saturation test. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  John C Whitman,et al.  Improving catalytic function by ProSAR-driven enzyme evolution , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Directed evolution of mammalian paraoxonases PON1 and PON3 for bacterial expression and catalytic specialization. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Structure and evolution of the serum paraoxonase family of detoxifying and anti-atherosclerotic enzymes , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[34]  F. Arnold,et al.  Directed Evolution Library Creation , 2003 .

[35]  Mats Holmquist,et al.  Focusing mutations into the P. fluorescens esterase binding site increases enantioselectivity more effectively than distant mutations. , 2005, Chemistry & biology.

[36]  Tony Cox,et al.  Engineered protein function by selective amino acid diversification. , 2004, Methods.

[37]  Roberto A Chica,et al.  Semi-rational approaches to engineering enzyme activity: combining the benefits of directed evolution and rational design. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[38]  Wilfred Chen,et al.  Active Site Engineering of the Epoxide Hydrolase from Agrobacterium radiobacter AD1 to Enhance Aerobic Mineralization of cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene in Cells Expressing an Evolved Toluene ortho-Monooxygenase* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.