Drawing the Line Between Perception and Interpretation in Computer-Aided Mammography

Screening mammography calls for a combination of perceptual skills to find what may be faint and small features in a complex visual environment, and interpretive skills to rate their diagnostic significance. Evidence suggests radiologists' performance of this task can be improved by computer-aided prompting of target features. The introduction of computer-aided mammography provides an interesting case study of `allocation of function' issues. One is where to `draw the line' between perception and interpretation when determining the system's functional role. Our investigations indicate that radiologists find a system which is `perceptually acute', but `interpretatively naive', more acceptable than predicted by earlier work. We present evidence that this is because drawing the line in this way helps radiologists to understand, and to monitor, the system's behaviour. A second issue concerns the impact of computer-aided mammography on existing practices

[1]  D E Forsythe,et al.  Using ethnography to build a working system: rethinking basic design assumptions. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[2]  B. Kaplan The Influence of Medical Values and Practices on Medical Computer Applications , 1982 .

[3]  G C Sutton,et al.  Computer‐aided diagnosis: A review , 1989, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  B. Kaplan Development and acceptance of medical information systems: an historical overview. , 1988, Journal of health and human resources administration.

[5]  R. Wilson On the evaluation of , 1940 .

[6]  G Hripcsak,et al.  Decision support in healthcare. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[7]  On the Evaluation of Microcalciication Detection Algorithms , 1996 .

[8]  W Simpson,et al.  The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. , 1995, Clinical radiology.

[9]  H A Heathfield,et al.  Philosophies for the Design and Development of Clinical Decision-Support Systems , 1993, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[10]  M. S. Blois Clinical judgment and computers. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  Rob Procter,et al.  Subjective reaction to prompting in screening mammography , 1997 .

[12]  A. Kirkpatrick,et al.  User Interface Design and Data Management for Digital Mass Mammography , 1994 .

[13]  L. Tabár,et al.  Teaching atlas of mammography. , 1983, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.

[14]  D. J. FINNEY Medicine and the Computer , 1966, Nature.

[15]  S. Duffy,et al.  Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.