Drawing the Line Between Perception and Interpretation in Computer-Aided Mammography
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D E Forsythe,et al. Using ethnography to build a working system: rethinking basic design assumptions. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.
[2] B. Kaplan. The Influence of Medical Values and Practices on Medical Computer Applications , 1982 .
[3] G C Sutton,et al. Computer‐aided diagnosis: A review , 1989, The British journal of surgery.
[4] B. Kaplan. Development and acceptance of medical information systems: an historical overview. , 1988, Journal of health and human resources administration.
[5] R. Wilson. On the evaluation of , 1940 .
[6] G Hripcsak,et al. Decision support in healthcare. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.
[7] On the Evaluation of Microcalciication Detection Algorithms , 1996 .
[8] W Simpson,et al. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. , 1995, Clinical radiology.
[9] H A Heathfield,et al. Philosophies for the Design and Development of Clinical Decision-Support Systems , 1993, Methods of Information in Medicine.
[10] M. S. Blois. Clinical judgment and computers. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] Rob Procter,et al. Subjective reaction to prompting in screening mammography , 1997 .
[12] A. Kirkpatrick,et al. User Interface Design and Data Management for Digital Mass Mammography , 1994 .
[13] L. Tabár,et al. Teaching atlas of mammography. , 1983, Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband.
[14] D. J. FINNEY. Medicine and the Computer , 1966, Nature.
[15] S. Duffy,et al. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. , 1995, The British journal of radiology.