Topographic distribution of brain activities corresponding to psychological structures underlying affective meanings: An fMRI study

Affective meanings aroused by various objects, such as paintings, melodies, or words, can be quantified by the semantic differential (SD) technique (Osgood, Suci, & Tannenbaum, 1957). In this technique, three main factors (“Evaluation,”“Activity,” and “Potency”) have been consistently extracted from factor analyses of participants' subjective ratings of various objects using bipolar scales of adjective pairs. In the present study, we investigated brain activity during SD ratings of line-drawing stimuli using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We compared brain activity among the three main factors underlying affective meanings. The overall results showed that Evaluation, Activity, and Potency produced brain activities in the inferior frontal gyrus, the superior temporal gyrus, and the superior frontal gyrus, respectively. These findings suggest that the psychological structures underlying affective meanings are distributed in specific areas of the brain.

[1]  Shigeko Takahashi,et al.  Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. , 1995, Psychological review.

[2]  Jiro Gyoba,et al.  Multichannel NIRS analysis of brain activity during semantic differential rating of drawing stimuli containing different affective polarities , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Hoshi.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: potential and limitations in neuroimaging studies. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[6]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  Two types of representation in visual memory: Evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast on image combination , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Seung-Schik Yoo,et al.  Neural substrates of tactile imagery: a functional MRI study , 2003, Neuroreport.

[8]  H. Siebner,et al.  Effector‐independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  M. Kringelbach.  The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  M J Brammer,et al.  A functional study of auditory verbal imagery , 2001, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Hearing in the Mind's Ear: A PET Investigation of Musical Imagery and Perception , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Roberto D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) : review, new comparisons, and new validation , 2002 .

[14]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Exploring the cortical evidence of a sensory-discrimination process. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  Michael Rotte,et al.  Combining a semantic differential with fMRI to investigate brands as cultural symbols. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  S. Zeki,et al.  Neural correlates of beauty. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  E. Macaluso,et al.  Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  W. Skrandies,et al.  Dimensions of affective semantic meaning — behavioral and evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  A. D’Ausilio,et al.  An fMRI investigation on image generation in different sensory modalities: the influence of vividness. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Hideaki Kawabata,et al.  [Analyses of the sensory relevance of adjective pairs by the modality differential method]. , 2006, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[21]  T. Oyama.  Synesthetic tendencies as the basis of sensory symbolism : A review of a series of experiments by means of semantic differential , 1998 .

[22]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  K Friston,et al.  Signal-, set- and movement-related activity in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Slice acquisition order and blood oxygenation level dependent frequency content: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2001 .

[26]  T. Dalgleish.  The emotional brain , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  G. Glover,et al.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[29]  D. Perrett,et al.  Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  W. Grodd,et al.  The speaking brain: a tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[31]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Implicit Associative Learning Engages the Hippocampus and Interacts with Explicit Associative Learning , 2005, Neuron.

[32]  R. Veit,et al.  BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: neuronal networks involved in frequency discrimination. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  W Skrandies,et al.  Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning--A brain mapping study. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  J. Gyoba,et al.  [Analyzing the factor structure and the sensory-relevance of impressions produced by words and drawings]. , 2003, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[36]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[37]  W. Skrandies,et al.  The Processing of Semantic Meaning in Chinese Words and Evoked Brain Topography , 2003, Brain Topography.

[38]  Marcos Nadal,et al.  Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. , 2008, Spatial vision.

[39]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action , 2005, Cognition.