Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN‐R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: Pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies

There are few clinical tools with both predictive validity for pressure ulcer healing and availability in broad populations. We evaluated whether the total scores from DESIGN‐R tool could predict pressure ulcer healing. We followed 3,196 patients with pressure ulcers from two multicenter cohort studies until wound healing, patient death, or discharge. Wound severity was evaluated by DESIGN‐R tool from 0 (healed) to 66 (greatest severity). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, higher DESIGN‐R total scores at baseline were associated with lower healing rates (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.89–0.92), independent of the patient's characteristics, setting types, and wound depth or location. DESIGN‐R had discriminative value for wound healing up to 90 days; the area under the receiver‐operating characteristics curve from univariate analysis was 0.81 for healing within 30 days and 0.74 for healing within 30–90 days. The cutoff points were 9 for healing within 30 days and 18 within 30–90 days (positive and negative predictive value 78.8 and 74.1%; 63.9 and 81.1%, respectively). These points were validated for both superficial and deep ulcers. DESIGN‐R can be a useful tool to predict pressure ulcer healing for a wide range of patient populations, settings, and wound locations.

[1]  Nancy Bergstrom,et al.  The National Pressure Ulcer Long‐Term Care Study: Outcomes of Pressure Ulcer Treatments in Long‐Term Care , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  K. Jones,et al.  Factors influencing pressure ulcer healing in adults over 50: an exploratory study. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[3]  H. Sanada,et al.  The impact of malnutrition and nutrition-related factors on the development and severity of pressure ulcers in older patients receiving home care. , 2010, Clinical nutrition.

[4]  G. Rodeheaver,et al.  An instrument to measure healing in pressure ulcers: development and validation of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  D. Thomas Pressure ulcer scale for healing, Derivation and varidation of the PUSH tool , 1997 .

[6]  N. Cullum,et al.  Health‐related quality of life in hospital inpatients with pressure ulceration: Assessment using generic health‐related quality of life measures , 2009, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[7]  J. Black,et al.  An overview of tissue types in pressure ulcers: a consensus panel recommendation. , 2010, Ostomy/wound management.

[8]  C. Bouza,et al.  Efficacy of advanced dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. , 2005, Journal of wound care.

[9]  B. Bates-Jensen,et al.  Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. , 1992, Decubitus.

[10]  A. Bartolucci,et al.  Using principal component analysis to describe wound status. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[11]  R. White,et al.  Critical colonization--the concept under scrutiny. , 2006, Ostomy/wound management.

[12]  H. Sanada,et al.  Do nutritional markers in wound fluid reflect pressure ulcer status? , 2010, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[13]  Hiromi Sanada,et al.  Development of the DESIGN‐R with an observational study: An absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing , 2011, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[14]  R. Allman,et al.  Pressure ulcers, hospital complications, and disease severity: impact on hospital costs and length of stay. , 1999, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[15]  Ulkü Yapucu Güneş A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers. , 2009, Ostomy/wound management.

[16]  W. Spector,et al.  Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer Healing in Nursing Homes , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  J. Posnett,et al.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK. , 2004, Age and ageing.

[18]  T. Dassen,et al.  The trend of pressure ulcer prevalence rates in German hospitals: results of seven cross-sectional studies. , 2009, Journal of tissue viability.

[19]  T. Dassen,et al.  Prevalence of deep tissue injuries in hospitals and nursing homes: two cross-sectional studies. , 2010, International journal of nursing studies.

[20]  G. Onder,et al.  Pressure ulcer and mortality in frail elderly people living in community. , 2007, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[21]  Sunila R. Kalkar,et al.  Treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review. , 2008, JAMA.

[22]  Y Miyachi,et al.  Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. , 2004, Journal of wound care.

[23]  C. Lyder,et al.  Wound‐Healing Outcomes Using Standardized Assessment and Care in Clinical Practice , 2004, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[24]  Debby Gawlitta,et al.  Deep tissue injury: how deep is our understanding? , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  R. Frantz,et al.  A prospective study of the pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH). , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[26]  H. Sanada,et al.  The Japanese pressure ulcer surveillance study: a retrospective cohort study to determine prevalence of pressure ulcers in Japanese hospitals. , 2008, Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice.

[27]  Conner Lm,et al.  In vivo (CT scan) comparison of vertical shear in human tissue caused by various support surfaces. , 1993 .

[28]  G T Rodeheaver,et al.  Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[29]  Marco Romanelli,et al.  Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management , 2003, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.