Haptic shape discrimination in humans: insight into haptic frames of reference

This study investigates how a change in the physical relation between objects (two-dimensional, 2-D, angles) and a subject, as well as scanning conditions, modify the ability to discriminate small changes in 2-D shape. Subjects scanned pairs of angles (90º standard; 91º–103º comparison angles) with the right index finger of the out-stretched arm, identifying the larger of each pair. When joint rotation was restricted to the shoulder, the discrimination threshold significantly increased when the angles were explored with the shoulder in a more eccentric position rather than closer to the midline (60º versus 30º to the right). This result was attributed to changes in proprioceptive sensitivity, since explorations restricted to distal joints (wrist/second metacarpophalangeal joint) showed no change with shoulder position. The results showed, moreover, that discrimination threshold was similar for distal and proximal joints when the delay between scanning the pairs of angles was long (15 s). This observation suggests that regional variations in proprioceptive acuity (proximal > distal) may reflect an adaptation to generate an invariant central representation of haptic shape. Using a shorter interscan delay (5 s), a position-dependent increase in discrimination threshold was revealed for distal explorations, an effect that disappeared when the head was turned in the direction of the unseen angle (vision occluded). We suggest that these results can be explained by the existence of two competing egocentric frames of reference with different time courses, one of short duration that is centred on the arm/hand, and a second of longer duration centred on the head. At the short delay, the reference frames interacted to distort the haptic representation when they were misaligned. This distortion was resolved at the long delay, possibly through suppression of the arm/hand-centred reference frame.

[1]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[2]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation , 1999, Nature.

[3]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[4]  Yale E. Cohen,et al.  A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[6]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[7]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Bias and sensitivity in the haptic perception of geometry , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large Systematic Deviations in the Haptic Perception of Parallelity , 1999, Perception.

[9]  F. J. Clark,et al.  A metric for assessing acuity in positioning joints and limbs , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Distribution of hand location in monkeys during spontaneous behavior , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  M Guerraz,et al.  The role of neck afferents in subjective orientation in the visual and tactile sensory modalities. , 2000, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Analysis of position sense in human shoulder. , 1958, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: two-dimensional angle discrimination , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  J. Soechting,et al.  Frames of Reference for Hand Orientation , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Spence,et al.  Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Albert Postma,et al.  Multisensory integration mechanisms in haptic space perception , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Roger Newport,et al.  Noninformative Vision Improves Haptic Spatial Perception , 2002, Current Biology.

[23]  Albert Postma,et al.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  El-Mehdi Meftah,et al.  Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. Milner,et al.  A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Haptic Perception of Spatial Relations , 1999, Perception.

[28]  Y. Lamarre,et al.  Haptic discrimination of object shape in humans: contribution of cutaneous and proprioceptive inputs , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.