Public Management Policy and Practice in Western China

On the basis of our fieldwork conducted during the past two decades, in this article, we report our principal findings about the metapolicy and tacit knowledge of public management in western China. We focus on the deeper patterns of managerial and organizational behavior and argue that Chinese bureaucratic culture and practices (especially practices of the Communist Party of China) have transformed various Western approaches (New Public Management, performance audit, etc.). In the process, government officials are also being transformed. Genuine administrative reform, as has diffused globally, has not taken place in China. Implications for Chinese administrative studies and management innovation transfer are discussed.

[1]  Gyorgy Gajduschek,et al.  Bureaucracy: Is It Efficient? Is It Not? Is That The Question? , 2003 .

[2]  H. Werlin Poor Nations, Rich Nations: A Theory of Governance , 2003 .

[3]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry , 1990 .

[4]  Ralph P. Hummel,et al.  The Bureaucratic Experience , 1977 .

[5]  A. Farazmand Chaos and Transformation Theories: A Theoretical Analysis with Implications for Organization Theory and Public Management , 2003 .

[6]  Miguel Hernandez Assessing Tacit Knowledge Transfer and Dimensions of a Learning Environment in Colombian Businesses , 2003 .

[7]  G. Candler Particularism versus Universalism in the Brazilian Public Administration Literature , 2002 .

[8]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration , 1979 .

[9]  B. J. Reed,et al.  New Public Management and Substantive Democracy , 2001 .

[10]  J. Mikesell,et al.  Reforming Budget Systems in Countries of the Former Soviet Union , 2001 .

[11]  T. Hellström,et al.  Innovation as Social Action , 2004 .

[12]  D. Argyriades Good governance, professionalism, ethics and responsibility , 2006 .

[13]  D. Kettl The Global Public Management Revolution , 2006 .

[14]  M. Whyte,et al.  Small Groups and Political Rituals in China , 1975 .

[15]  P. Savage,et al.  Optimism and Pessimism in Comparative Administration , 1976 .

[16]  Guy B. Adams Organizational Metapaiterns , 1993 .

[17]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Typologies, Taxonomies, and the Benefits of Policy Classification , 2002 .

[18]  John G. Heilman,et al.  Metapolicy Transition and Policy Implementation: New Federalism and Privatization , 1987 .

[19]  L. R. Wise Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucratic Behavior , 2004 .

[20]  Lowell Dittmer China in 1980: Modernization and Its Discontents , 1981 .

[21]  Kenneth J. Meier,et al.  Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating , 2000 .

[22]  E. Sam Overman The New Sciences of Administration: Chaos and Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[23]  Margit Tavits,et al.  Agencification in Estonia , 2006 .

[24]  M. Grindle Modernising town hall: capacity building with a political twist , 2006 .

[25]  Civil Service Reform in the People’s Republic of China: Another Mirage of the New Global Paradigm of Public Administration? , 2001 .

[26]  M. Agar Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative , 1988 .

[27]  S. Haque,et al.  The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance , 2001 .

[28]  K. Chow Reforn of the Chinese Cadre System: Pitfalls, Issues and Implications of the Proposed Civil Service System , 1991 .

[29]  Eric Thun,et al.  Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Local Governments, Industrial Sectors, and Development in China , 2001 .

[30]  Cathleen McGrath,et al.  The Future of Innovation Diffusion Research and its Implications for Management , 2001 .

[31]  Janice L. Caulfield,et al.  Local government reform in China: a rational actor perspective , 2006 .

[32]  F. Heady,et al.  Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective , 1995 .

[33]  J. P. Burns,et al.  The Hong Kong civil service and its future , 1988 .

[34]  Jack D. Kem,et al.  Moral Reasoning in the Context of Reform: A Study of Russian Officials , 2002 .

[35]  C. Alford Whistle-Blowers , 1999 .

[36]  Hon S. Chan,et al.  China's New Civil Service: What the Emperor Is Wearing and Why , 1996 .

[37]  L. Terry Administrative Leadership, Neo-Managerialism, and the Public Management Movement , 1998 .

[38]  Barry J. Naughton,et al.  The Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms , 1999 .

[39]  K. König On the Typology of Public Administration , 2003 .

[40]  Kiyoshige Yamamoto Performance of semi‐autonomous public bodies: linkage between autonomy and performance in Japanese agencies , 2006 .

[41]  A. Cheung Understanding public-sector reforms: global trends and diverse agendas , 1997 .

[42]  Nick Manning,et al.  The Legacy of the New Public Management in Developing Countries , 2001 .

[43]  R. Denhardt,et al.  The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering , 2000 .

[44]  L. Terry The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State , 2005 .

[45]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  Disaster management as contingent meta-policy analysis: Water resource planning , 1994 .

[46]  M. Grindle Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[47]  Harry Harding From China, with Disdain: New Trends in the Study of China , 1982 .