Effects of Mixing Schemes on Kerosene Combustion in a Supersonic Airstream

A study of kerosene combustion in a supersonic vitiated aire ow at Mach 4.75 e ight enthalpy was conducted in direct-connect tests at Mach 1.8 at a stagnation temperature of 1000 K. The effects of shockand vortex-enhanced mixing mechanisms on the combustion efe ciency were evaluated. Also included in this study were the effects of fuel heating and jet penetration. The experimental conditions corresponded to the low end of the hypersonic e ight regime. The following geometric cone gurations were employed: 1) a generic, rearward-facing step, 2 ) a modie ed rearward-facing step with beveled edges to facilitate vortex-enhanced mixing, and 3 ) a rearward-facing wedge (15 or 30 deg) placed downstream of the rearward-facing step to induce shock-enhanced mixing. In all cone gurations, a gaseous hydrogen ‐ pilot jet was injected parallel to the main e ow from the base of the rearward-facing step and the liquid kerosene was injected normal to the main e ow at three or e ve step heights downstream of the step (the step height was 10 mm). Stable kerosene combustion was obtained for a maximum injected kerosene equivalence ratio of 0.86. For efe ciency evaluation, the pilot ‐ hydrogen equivalence ratio was selected between 0.02 ‐ 0.04, while the kerosene equivalence ratio was maintained at 0.325. In all experiments, locally rich stratie ed kerosene combustion took place in a layer close to the injection wall. The wedge e ameholder contributed to an increased kerosene combustion efe ciency by the generation of shock ‐ jet interactions. The beveled-edge step improved far-e eld mixing, thereby reducing the local kerosene equivalence ratio, resulting in the highest kerosene combustion efe ciency among all cone gurations tested. Fuel heating below levels required for e ash vaporization (one-third of the e ash vaporization energy, in this case ) did not contribute to increased combustion efe ciency. On the contrary, this level of heating reduced the fuel density with adverse effects on penetration and mixing.

[1]  J. A. Schetz,et al.  Mixing studies of helium in air at high supersonic speeds , 1992 .

[2]  F. S. Billig,et al.  Penetration of gaseous jets injected into a supersonic stream. , 1966 .

[3]  J. A. Schetz,et al.  Low angle injection into a supersonic flow , 1989 .

[4]  Joseph A. Schetz,et al.  Structure of highly underexpanded transverse jets in a supersonic stream. , 1967 .

[5]  J. A. Schetz,et al.  Supersonic transverse injection into a supersonic stream. , 1968 .

[6]  C. Segal,et al.  Development of an experimentally flexible facility for mixing-combustion interactions in supersonic flow , 1996 .

[7]  Roland H. Krauss,et al.  Mixing and Chemical Kinetics Interactions in a Mach 2 Reacting Flow , 1995 .

[8]  Edward E. Zukoski,et al.  A model for characterization of a vortex pair formed by shock passage over a light-gas inhomogeneity , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  G. B. Northam,et al.  Evaluation of parallel injector configurations for Mach 2 combustion , 1992 .

[10]  Dennis H. Petley,et al.  Thermal Management for a Mach 5 Cruise Aircraft Using Endothermic Fuel , 1992 .

[11]  Joseph A. Schetz,et al.  Fuel-vortex interactions for enhanced mixing in supersonic flow , 1996 .

[12]  F. Billig Research on supersonic combustion , 1992 .

[13]  Corin Segal,et al.  Hydrogen piloted energy for supersonic combustion of liquid fuels , 1995 .

[14]  R. N. Guile,et al.  Hydrocarbon-fueled scramjet combustor investigation , 1992 .

[15]  M. R. Gruber,et al.  Mixing and Penetration Studies of Sonic Jets in a Mach 2 Freestream , 1995 .

[16]  R. W. Paterson,et al.  Enhanced mixing of supersonic jets , 1991 .

[17]  Paul J. Waltrup,et al.  Liquid-fueled supersonic combustion ramjets - A research perspective , 1987 .

[18]  James C. McDaniel,et al.  Experimental investigation of a supersonic swept ramp injector using laser-induced iodine fluorescence , 1994 .