Energy density and rate limitations in structural composite supercapacitors

The weight and volume of conventional energy storage technologies greatly limits their performance in mobile platforms. Traditional research efforts target improvements in energy density to reduce device size and mass. Enabling a device to perform additional functions, such as bearing mechanical load, is an alternative approach as long as the total mass efficiency exceeds that of the individual materials it replaces. Our research focuses on structural composites that function as batteries and supercapacitors. These multifunctional devices could be used to replace conventional structural components, such as vehicle frame elements, to provide significant system-level weight reductions and extend mission times. Our approach is to design structural properties directly into the electrolyte and electrode materials. Solid polymer electrolyte materials bind the system and transfer load to the fibers while conducting ions between the electrodes. Carbon fiber electrodes provide a route towards optimizing both energy storage and load-bearing capabilities, and may also obviate the need for a separate current collector. The components are being integrated using scalable, cost-effective composite processing techniques that are amenable to complex part shapes. Practical considerations of energy density and rate behavior are described here as they relate to materials used. Our results highlight the viability as well as the challenges of this multifunctional approach towards energy storage.

[1]  Jim P. Zheng,et al.  The Effect of Salt Concentration in Electrolytes on the Maximum Energy Storage for Double Layer Capacitors , 1997 .

[2]  James F. Snyder,et al.  Evaluation of Commercially Available Carbon Fibers, Fabrics, and Papers for Potential Use in Multifunctional Energy Storage Applications , 2009 .

[3]  James F. Snyder,et al.  Multifunctional Properties of Structural Gel Electrolytes , 2008 .

[4]  M. Wysocki,et al.  Structural batteries made from fibre reinforced composites , 2010 .

[5]  Dan Zenkert,et al.  PAN-Based Carbon Fiber Negative Electrodes for Structural Lithium-Ion Batteries , 2011 .

[6]  Jim P. Zheng,et al.  The Limitations of Energy Density for Electrochemical Capacitors , 1997 .

[7]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Multifunctional Structural Composite Batteries , 2007 .

[8]  A. Lewandowski,et al.  Practical and theoretical limits for electrochemical double-layer capacitors , 2007 .

[9]  Elena Sherman,et al.  Design and fabrication of multifunctional structural batteries , 2009 .

[10]  Young-Il Jang,et al.  Rubbery Block Copolymer Electrolytes for Solid‐State Rechargeable Lithium Batteries , 1999 .

[11]  Jim P. Zheng,et al.  Theoretical Energy Density for Electrochemical Capacitors with Intercalation Electrodes , 2005 .

[12]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Improving multifunctional behavior in structural electrolytes through copolymerization of structure- and conductivity-promoting monomers , 2009 .

[13]  James P. Thomas,et al.  Mechanical design and performance of composite multifunctional materials , 2004 .

[14]  Chung-an Max Wu,et al.  Effect of Salt Depletion on Charging Dynamics in Nanoporous Electrodes , 2010 .

[15]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground , MD 21005-5069 ARL-RP-193 September 2007 Multifunctional Structural Composite Batteries for U . S . Army Applications , 2007 .

[16]  Jim P. Zheng,et al.  The Limitations of Energy Density of Battery/Double-Layer Capacitor Asymmetric Cells , 2003 .

[17]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Electrochemical and mechanical behavior in mechanically robust solid polymer electrolytes for use in multifunctional structural batteries , 2007 .