Feasibility of performing space surveillance tasks with a proposed space-based optical architecture

Abstract Under ESA contract an industrial consortium including Aboa Space Research Oy (ASRO), the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB), and the Dutch National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR), proposed the observation concept, developed a suitable sensor architecture, and assessed the performance of a space-based optical (SBO) telescope in 2005. The goal of the SBO study was to analyse how the existing knowledge gap in the space debris population in the millimetre and centimetre regime may be closed by means of a passive optical instrument. The SBO instrument was requested to provide statistical information on the space debris population in terms of number of objects and size distribution. The SBO instrument was considered to be a cost-efficient with 20 cm aperture and 6° field-of-view and having flexible integration requirements. It should be possible to integrate the SBO instrument easily as a secondary payload on satellites launched into low-Earth orbits (LEO), or into geostationary orbit (GEO). Thus the selected mission concept only allowed for fix-mounted telescopes, and the pointing direction could be requested freely. Since 2007 ESA focuses space surveillance and tracking activities in the Space Situational Awareness (SSA) preparatory program. Ground-based radars and optical telescopes are studied for the build-up and maintenance of a catalogue of objects. In this paper we analyse how the proposed SBO architecture could contribute to the space surveillance tasks survey and tracking. We assume that the SBO instrumentation is placed into a circular sun-synchronous orbit at 800 km altitude. We discuss the observation conditions of objects at higher altitude, and select an orbit close to the terminator plane. A pointing of the sensor orthogonal to the orbital plane with optimal elevation slightly in positive direction (0° and +5°) is found optimal for accessing the entire GEO regime within one day, implying a very good coverage of controlled objects in GEO, too. Simulations using ESA’s Program for Radar and Optical Observation Forecasting (PROOF) in the version 2005 and a GEO reference population extracted from DISCOS revealed that the proposed pointing scenario provides low phase angles together with low angular velocities of the objects crossing the field-of-view. Radiometric simulations show that the optimal exposure time is 1–2 s, and that spherical objects in GEO with a diameter of below 1 m can be detected. The GEO population can be covered under proper illumination nearly completely, but seasonal drops of the coverage are possible. Subsequent observations of objects are on average at least every 1.5 days, not exceeding 3 days at maximum. A single observation arc spans 3° to 5° on average. Using a simulation environment that connects PROOF to AIUB’s program system CelMech we verify the consistency of the initial orbit determination for five selected test objects on subsequent days as a function of realistic astrometric noise levels. The initial orbit determination is possible. We define requirements for a correlator process essential for catalogue build-up and maintenance. Each single observation should provide an astrometric accuracy of at least 1”–1.5” so that the initially determined orbits are consistent within a few hundred kilometres for the semi-major axis, 0.01 for the eccentricity, and 0.1° for the inclination.

[1]  Michael Oswald,et al.  Concept for an orbital telescope observing the debris environment in GEO , 2004 .

[2]  G. Beutler Methods of celestial mechanics , 2005 .

[3]  Jayant Sharma,et al.  Space-Based Space Surveillance with the Space-Based Visible , 2000 .

[4]  Tim Flohrer,et al.  Proposed strategies for optical observations in a future European Space Surveillance network , 2006 .

[5]  David C. Harrison,et al.  The Space-Based Visible Sensor , 1996 .

[6]  Thomas Schildknecht,et al.  PROOF — The extension of esa's MASTER Model to predict debris detections , 2000 .

[7]  Thomas Schildknecht,et al.  Optical surveys for space debris , 2007 .

[8]  Simon F. Green,et al.  Development of concepts for detection and characterisation of debris in Earth orbit using passive optical instruments , 1993 .

[9]  Tim Flohrer,et al.  Performance of a Proposed Instrument for Space-Based Optical Observations of Space Debris , 2006 .

[10]  G. Beutler,et al.  Orbit improvement for GEO objects using follow-up observations , 2004 .

[11]  Villafranca del Castillo,et al.  The European Surveillance and Tracking System - Services and Design Drivers , 2010 .

[12]  Patrick Seitzer,et al.  SURVEY AND CHASE: A NEW METHOD OF OBSERVATIONS FOR THE MICHIGAN ORBITAL DEBRIS SURVEY TELESCOPE (MODEST) , 2006 .

[13]  P R Maskell,et al.  Sapphire: Canada's Answer to Space-Based Surveillance of Orbital Objects , 2008 .

[14]  Holger Krag,et al.  Space based optical observation of small debris objects , 2001 .