Analyzing a transition to a sustainability-oriented science system in Germany

The multi-level perspective has successfully been applied to the analysis of complex sector transitions in the energy, the health or the food production sector. Is this framework also helpful to understand and give prescriptive advice for sustainability transformations within a national science system? Based on a comprehensive study of the diffusion of transdisciplinary sustainability research in Germany, this article analyzes the institutional dimension of a changing science-society relation in the German science system. It uses the multi-level perspective as a fruitful heuristic in order to identify potential pathways for a broader diffusion of transdisciplinary sustainability science. The importance of niche coalitions of frontrunner universities and research institutes are highlighted.

[1]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  R. Robertson,et al.  Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University , 2008 .

[3]  Jennie C. Stephens,et al.  Toward an empirical research agenda for sustainability in higher education: exploring the transition management framework , 2010 .

[4]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  Transforming Knowledge for Sustainability: Towards Adaptive Academic Institutions , 2011 .

[5]  A. S. uiterkamp,et al.  Environmental Literacy in Science and Society , 2013 .

[6]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Coordination within fragmentation: Governance in knowledge policy in the German federal system , 2008 .

[7]  M. Albornoz.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[8]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[9]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[10]  W. Clark,et al.  Academic charisma and the origins of the research university , 2006 .

[11]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[12]  Paul Burger,et al.  Disentangling Transdisciplinarity: An Analysis of Knowledge Integration in Problem-Oriented Research , 2007 .

[13]  J. Jäger.  Risks and Opportunities for Sustainability Science in Europe , 2011 .

[14]  B. Martin,et al.  University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison , 2003 .

[15]  J. Voss.  Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development – Incorporating feedback in social problem solving , 2005 .

[16]  Petra Wächter.  Transitions to sustainable development – new directions in the study of long term transformative change , 2012 .

[17]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Major system change through stepwise reconfiguration: A multi-level analysis of the transformation of American factory production (1850-1930) , 2006 .

[18]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Sustainability science: building a new discipline , 2006 .

[19]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Economics of Knowledge Production: Funding and the Structure of University Research , 1999 .

[20]  Matthias Bergmann,et al.  Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung , 2010 .

[21]  P. Martens,et al.  Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? , 2007 .

[22]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview , 2011 .

[23]  J. Meadowcroft.  What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions , 2009 .

[24]  F. Geels,et al.  The dynamics of transitions: a socio-technical perspective , 2010 .

[25]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[26]  G. Wagner.  Does excellence matter? , 2007 .

[27]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[28]  Frederic S. Lee,et al.  Research Selectivity, Managerialism, and the Academic Labor Process: The Future of Nonmainstream Economics in U.K. Universities , 1997 .

[29]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[30]  Aviel Verbruggen,et al.  UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS EXPLORED , 2010 .

[31]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[32]  R. Scholz.  Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions , 2011 .

[33]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  Transition Management: A Reflexive Governance Approach , 2006 .

[34]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[35]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[36]  J. David Tàbara,et al.  European Research on Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[37]  Rol'f Hizer.  University Strategy in an Age of Uncertainty: the Effect of HIgher Education Funding on Old and New Universities , 2006 .