The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke.

Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability and the recovery of motor function is important for independence in activities of daily living. Predicting motor recovery after stroke in individual patients is difficult. Accurate prognosis would enable realistic rehabilitation goal-setting and more efficient allocation of resources. The aim of this study was to test and refine an algorithm for predicting the potential for recovery of upper limb function after stroke. Forty participants were prospectively enrolled within 3 days of ischaemic stroke. First, shoulder abduction and finger extension strength were graded 72 h after stroke onset to compute a shoulder abduction and finger extension score. Secondly, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess the functional integrity of descending motor pathways to the affected upper limb. Third, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the structural integrity of the posterior limbs of the internal capsules. Finally, these measures were combined in the PREP algorithm for predicting an individual's potential for upper limb recovery at 12 weeks, measured with the Action Research Arm Test. A cluster analysis was used to independently group patients according to Action Research Arm Test score at 12 weeks, for comparison with predictions from the PREP algorithm. There was excellent correspondence between the cluster analysis of Action Research Arm Test score at 12 weeks and predictions made with the PREP algorithm. The algorithm had positive predictive power of 88%, negative predictive power of 83%, specificity of 88% and sensitivity of 73%. This study provides preliminary data in support of the PREP algorithm for the prognosis of upper limb recovery in individual patients. PREP may enable tailored planning of rehabilitation and more accurate stratification of patients in clinical trials.

[1]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[2]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A Cruz Martínez,et al.  Motor hand recovery after stroke. Prognostic yield of early transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  C. Sotak,et al.  The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury – a review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Impact of internal capsule lesions on outcome of motor hand function at one year post-stroke. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  M. Reding,et al.  Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[8]  Sung Ho Jang,et al.  Combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor tractography for prediction of motor outcome in patients with corona radiata infarct. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[9]  K. Furie,et al.  Stroke: Working Toward a Prioritized World Agenda , 2010, Stroke.

[10]  M. Escudero,et al.  Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. , 1998, Stroke.

[11]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  N. Ward,et al.  Assessment of cortical reorganisation for hand function after stroke , 2011, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  S. Remollo,et al.  Acute Damage to the Posterior Limb of the Internal Capsule on Diffusion Tensor Tractography as an Early Imaging Predictor of Motor Outcome after Stroke , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[14]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Presence of Finger Extension and Shoulder Abduction Within 72 Hours After Stroke Predicts Functional Recovery: Early Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke: The EPOS Cohort Study , 2010, Stroke.

[15]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  Alexander W Dromerick,et al.  Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  C. Stinear,et al.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[18]  S. Jang,et al.  Comparison of TMS and DTT for predicting motor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage , 2010, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[19]  M. Graziano The organization of behavioral repertoire in motor cortex. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[20]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[21]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Active Finger Extension: A Simple Movement Predicting Recovery of Arm Function in Patients With Acute Stroke , 2007, Stroke.

[22]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Acute Corticospinal Tract Wallerian Degeneration Is Associated With Stroke Outcome , 2010, Stroke.

[23]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 1. Natural history of central motor conduction. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.

[25]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging, permanent pyramidal tract damage, and outcome in subcortical stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[26]  Scott E Kasner,et al.  Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[27]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  P. Katrak,et al.  Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.