Knowledge resource exchange in strategic alliances

Strategic alliances are no longer a strategic option but a necessity in many markets and industries. Dynamic markets for both end products and technologies, coupled with the increasing costs of doing business, have resulted in a significant increase in the use of alliances. Yet, managers are finding it increasingly difficult to capture value from alliances. In this paper, we present a model that describes the knowledge resource exchange between alliance partners. This model focuses on the different dimensions of knowledge resources (tacitness, specificity, and complexity) and their associated value implications, as well as the different roles of the partner based on its position within an industry network (complementor, competitor, supplier, customer, or other). We also argue that in order to capture and internalize knowledge obtained through an alliance, a firm must have an alliance learning capability. We illustrate the use of this model in the computer industry by analyzing the publicly announced alliances of Dell Computer Corporation and Sun Microsystems, Inc. By applying our resource exchange model, we were able to analyze the alliance strategy for each firm and to understand the alignment between the announced business strategy and alliance strategy for each firm. The findings suggest that what is important is not necessarily a particular alliance strategy, but rather an alignment between alliance strategy and business strategy.

[1]  David Ernst,et al.  Is your strategic alliance really a sale , 1995 .

[2]  A. J. Magrath,et al.  Building customer partnerships , 1994 .

[3]  Peter P. Pekar,et al.  Smart Alliances: A Practical Guide to Repeatable Success , 1998 .

[4]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[5]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[6]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[7]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[9]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[10]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[12]  John C. Henderson,et al.  The Shifting Ground Between Markets and Hierarchy: Managing a Portfolio of Relationships , 1999 .

[13]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[14]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[15]  J. Slocum,et al.  Global strategic alliances: Payoffs and pitfalls , 1991 .

[16]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[18]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[19]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[20]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[21]  Jeffrey H. Dyer Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[22]  O. Williamson The economic institutions of capitalism , 1985 .

[23]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[24]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[25]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .