Group value and intention to use - A study of multi-agency disaster management information systems for public safety

This paper examines and extends the theory of information systems success in the context of large-scale disaster management (DM) for public safety. In the recent past, various evaluation reports on DM efforts have concluded that information quality and system quality are major hurdles for efficient and effective multi-agency DM and are critical antecedents for information systems (IS) success. In contrast to the wealth of literature on IS success in profit-oriented business environments, research regarding drivers of public sector IS success is scarce. This research develops and empirically tests a model that explains IS usage intention as a reflective measure of IS success in the public sector DM domain. In this paper, the effects of the expected value of IS for the entire group of collaborating DM agencies, task support, user satisfaction, and three specific information/service quality dimensions on usage intention are examined. Data was collected from emergency responders using a questionnaire survey method during multi-agency, cross-national DM exercises at the Dutch-German border. The results of the data analysis revealed that expected group value is a key determinant of intention to use in the public sector DM domain. The data analysis also showed that perceived task support only has an indirect effect, through user satisfaction, on the usage intention. These findings imply that previously suggested IS success models for business environments are likely to fall short in their explanatory power and applicability for highly volatile complex disaster environments that require immediate coordinated responses from a large number of organizations. Possible directions for future research are also discussed along with other findings and implications.

[1]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality-control handbook , 1951 .

[2]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Problematical aspects of the information/ communication revolution for disaster planning and research: ten non‐technical issues and questions , 1997 .

[3]  Christopher Cooper,et al.  Disaster: Hurricane Katrina and the Failure of Homeland Security , 2006 .

[4]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[5]  Pratyush Bharati,et al.  People and Information Matter: Task Support Satisfaction from the other Side , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Xiang Yao,et al.  The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS) , 2004 .

[7]  William R. King,et al.  An empirical study of the impacts of integrating business planning and information systems planning , 1999 .

[8]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  ASSURING HOMELAND SECURITY : CONTINUOUS MONITORING , CONTROL & ASSURANCE OF EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS , 2005 .

[9]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Heng-Chiang Huang,et al.  Determinants of e-repurchase intentions: An integrative model of quadruple retention drivers , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Thomas A. Horan,et al.  Time-critical information services , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Kay M. Nelson,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1993 THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHARED KNOWLEDGE TO IS GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2017 .

[13]  Craig W. Fisher,et al.  Criticality of data quality as exemplified in two disasters , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Advances in multi-agency disaster management: Key elements in disaster research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[15]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  Yi-Shun Wang Assessing e‐commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  Decision support for emergency situations , 2008, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[18]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Use of Computers , 1996 .

[19]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Perceived risks, counter-beliefs, and intentions to use anti-/counter-terrorism websites: An exploratory study of government-citizens online interactions in a turbulent environment , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Jing Yang,et al.  Interorganizational Communications in Disaster Management , 2009 .

[21]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[22]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  ONE FIGHT, ONE TEAM: THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT ON INTELLIGENCE, FRAGMENTATION AND INFORMATION , 2006 .

[23]  Philip J. Weiser Communicating During Emergencies: Toward Interoperability and Effective Information Management , 2007 .

[24]  Naim Kapucu,et al.  Interstate Partnerships in Emergency Management: Emergency Management Assistance Compact in Response to Catastrophic Disasters , 2009 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[26]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit , 1998 .

[27]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[28]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[29]  M. Fischetti Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.

[30]  Jidi Zhao,et al.  Mission-Critical Group Decision-Making: Solving the Problem of Decision Preference Change in Group Decision-Making Using markov Chain Model , 2008, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[31]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[33]  M. Turoff,et al.  Session details: Emergency response information systems: emerging trends and technologies , 2007 .

[34]  David Mendonça,et al.  Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[35]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[36]  Louis F. Weschler,et al.  Emergency management and the intergovernmental system , 1985 .

[37]  W. Petak Emergency Management: A Challenge for Public Administration , 1985 .

[38]  Holmes Miller,et al.  The Multiple Dimensions of Information Quality , 1996, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[39]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[40]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Handbook of Research on ICT-Enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective [EDITED BOOK], , 2009 .

[41]  Bruce B. Cahan,et al.  Learning From Crisis , 2004 .

[42]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[45]  I. Ajzen Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations , 2002 .

[46]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  I. Helsloot,et al.  Bordering on Reality: Findings on the Bonfire Crisis Management Simulation , 2005 .

[48]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  E-Government Capabilities and Crisis Management: Lessons from Combating SARS in Singapore , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[49]  R. Rosenfeld Belief , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[50]  R Stephenson,et al.  Disasters and the information technology revolution. , 1997, Disasters.

[51]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[52]  Basit Shafiq,et al.  Approach for Discovering and Handling Crisis in a Service-Oriented Environment , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics.

[53]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Inter-organizational information systems research: a critical review and an integrative framework , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[54]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[55]  Kenneth J. Knapp Cyber Security and Global Information Assurance: Threat Analysis and Response Solutions , 2009 .

[56]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis, Response and Management (ISCRAM 2008) , 2008 .

[57]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Extending the Understanding of End User Information Systems Satisfaction Formation: An Equitable Needs Fulfillment Model Approach , 2008, MIS Q..

[58]  Mark I. Hwang,et al.  Decision making under time pressure: A model for information systems research , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[60]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  R. A. Stallings,et al.  Methods of Disaster Research , 2003 .

[62]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[65]  Insu Park,et al.  Information Sharing: A Study of Information Attributes and their Relative Significance During Catastrophic Events , 2009 .

[66]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Transforming Crisis Management: Field Studies on the Efforts to Migrate from System-Centric to Network-Centric Operations , 2009, EGOV.

[67]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[69]  Kevin E. Dow,et al.  A Comparison of Structural Equation Modeling Approaches: The Case of User Acceptance of Information Systems , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Louise K. Comfort,et al.  Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001 , 2006 .

[71]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.