Who wants to know?: question-asking and answering practices among facebook users

Research has identified a link between Facebook use and bridging social capital, which speaks to the informational resources provided by a diverse network of connections. In order to explicate the mechanism through which Facebook may help individuals mobilize these embedded informational and support resources, this study explores the role of bridging social capital, question type, and relational closeness on the perceived utility and satisfaction of information obtained through questions posed to one's network of Facebook Friends through the status update feature. Employing a mixed-method approach, we utilize survey data collected from a sample of non-academic university staff (N=666), as well as actual Facebook question examples and responses collected during a follow-up lab session from a subset of this sample (N=71). Results indicate that question-askers' bridging social capital positively predicts the utility of responses received on SNS, while useful responses are more likely to be received from weaker ties.

[1]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Motivations for social networking at work , 2008, CSCW.

[3]  Marshall Van Alstyne,et al.  The Diversity-Bandwidth Tradeoff , 2010 .

[4]  T. Brooks Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart , 1999 .

[5]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties , 2013, CSCW.

[8]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Reijo Savolainen Everyday life information seeking: Approaching information seeking in the context of “way of life” , 1995 .

[10]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked Via Social Network Status Messages , 2011, ICWSM.

[11]  David R. Karger,et al.  Tie strength in question & answer on social network sites , 2012, CSCW '12.

[12]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[13]  W. Dutton,et al.  A DECADE IN INTERNET TIME , 2012 .

[14]  John Boyd-Carpenter,et al.  Way of life , 1980 .

[15]  D. Lazer,et al.  The Strength of Strong Ties , 2003 .

[16]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study , 2011, ICWSM.

[17]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users , 2011, CHI.

[18]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Alain Degenne Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[20]  J. Richardson Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[21]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[22]  P. Bourdieu Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[23]  F. Maxwell Harper,et al.  Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q&A sites , 2009, CHI.

[24]  Rafael Wittek,et al.  Structural Holes , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[27]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[28]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Perceptions of facebook's value as an information source , 2012, CHI.