Two distinct HLA-A*0101-specific submotifs illustrate alternative peptide binding modes

Abstract Previous studies have defined two different peptide binding motifs specific for HLA-A*0101. These motifs are characterized by the presence of tyrosine (Y) at the C-termini of 9-mer and 10-mer peptides, and either a small polar or hydrophobic (S, T, M) residue in position 2, or a negatively charged (D or E) residue in position 3. In this study, the structural requirements for peptide binding to A*0101 have been further analyzed by examining the binding capacity of large sets of peptides corresponding to naturally occurring sequences which bore one or the other of these two A*0101-specific motifs. By correlating the presence of specific residue types at each position along the peptide sequence with increased (or decreased) binding affinity, the prominent influence of secondary anchor residues was revealed. In most cases, the two anchors in positions 2 and 3 appear to act synergistically. With the exception of the DE3 submotif in 9-mer peptides, a positive role for aromatic residues in position 1 and the center of the peptide (positions 4 or 5 of 9- or 10-mer peptides, respectively), and proline at C-3, were also consistently detected. However, secondary anchor residues also appear to differ significantly between the two different submotifs, demonstrating that A*0101 can utilize alternative modes in binding its peptide ligands. According to these analyses, specific refined submotifs were also established, and their merit verified by independent sets of potential A*0101 binding peptides. Besides providing useful insight into the nature of the interaction of the A*0101 allele with its peptide ligands, such refined motifs should also facilitate accurate prediction of potential A*0101-restricted peptide epitopes.

[1]  J. Sidney,et al.  Peptide binding to the most frequent HLA-A class I alleles measured by quantitative molecular binding assays. , 1994, Molecular immunology.

[2]  M F del Guercio,et al.  Definition of an HLA-A3-like supermotif demonstrates the overlapping peptide-binding repertoires of common HLA molecules. , 1996, Human immunology.

[3]  K. Parker,et al.  Sequence motifs important for peptide binding to the human MHC class I molecule, HLA-A2. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[4]  P. Parham,et al.  The HLA-A,B "negative" mutant cell line C1R expresses a novel HLA-B35 allele, which also has a point mutation in the translation initiation codon. , 1992, Journal of immunology.

[5]  D. Wiley,et al.  The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC complexes: A comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by HLA-A2 , 1993, Cell.

[6]  C. Barnstable,et al.  Production of monoclonal antibodies to group A erythrocytes, HLA and other human cell surface antigens-new tools for genetic analysis , 1978, Cell.

[7]  D. Madden The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[8]  S. Rowland-Jones,et al.  A sequence pattern for peptides presented to cytotoxic T lymphocytes by HLA B8 revealed by analysis of epitopes and eluted peptides , 1993, European journal of immunology.

[9]  G. R. Ewoldt “ Role of HLA-A Motifs in Identification of Potential CTL Epitopes Inhuman Papillomavirus Type 16 E 6 and E 7 Proteins ” , 2022 .

[10]  M F del Guercio,et al.  Prominent roles of secondary anchor residues in peptide binding to HLA-A24 human class I molecules. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[11]  A Sette,et al.  Role of HLA-A motifs in identification of potential CTL epitopes in human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 proteins. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[12]  A Sette,et al.  Definition of specific peptide motifs for four major HLA-A alleles. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[13]  C. Schönbach,et al.  Fine tuning of peptide binding to HLA-B*3501 molecules by nonanchor residues. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[14]  B. Malissen,et al.  Structural and genetic analyses of HLA class I molecules using monoclonal xenoantibodies. , 2008, Tissue antigens.

[15]  C Oseroff,et al.  HLA-DR3 molecules can bind peptides carrying two alternative specific submotifs. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[16]  M F del Guercio,et al.  Specificity and degeneracy in peptide binding to HLA-B7-like class I molecules. , 1996, Journal of immunology.

[17]  D. Wiley,et al.  Refined structure of the human histocompatibility antigen HLA-A2 at 2.6 A resolution. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  A. Townsend,et al.  Antigen recognition by class I-restricted T lymphocytes. , 1989, Annual review of immunology.

[19]  K. Parker,et al.  Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[20]  J. Sidney,et al.  Prominent role of secondary anchor residues in peptide binding to HLA-A2.1 molecules , 1993, Cell.

[21]  M F del Guercio,et al.  Several HLA alleles share overlapping peptide specificities. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[22]  K. Parker,et al.  Endogenous peptides with distinct amino acid anchor residue motifs bind to HLA-A1 and HLA-B8. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[23]  F. Greenwood,et al.  THE PREPARATION OF I-131-LABELLED HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE OF HIGH SPECIFIC RADIOACTIVITY. , 1963, The Biochemical journal.