Selecting an Expansion Machine for Vehicle Waste-Heat Recovery Systems Based on the Rankine Cycle

An important objective in combustion engine research is to develop strategies for recovering waste heat and thereby increasing the efficiency of the propulsion system. Waste-heat recovery systems based on the Rankine cycle are the most efficient tools for recovering energy from the exhaust gas and the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system. The properties of the working fluid and the expansion machine have significant effects on Rankine cycle efficiency. The expansion machine is particularly important because it is the interface at which recovered heat energy is ultimately converted into power. Parameters such as the pressure, temperature and mass-flow conditions in the cycle can be derived for a given waste-heat source and expressed as dimensionless numbers that can be used to determine whether displacement expanders or turbo expanders would be preferable under the circumstances considered. The goal of this theoretical study was to use this approach to analyze waste-heat recovery systems for a heavy-duty diesel engine and a light-duty gasoline engine. Given the different waste-heat rates of these two engines, the relationships between Rankine cycle performance and design aspects such as the expansion ratio and the locations of pinch points in the heat exchanger were evaluated. The calculated values of these parameters were used as inputs in a dimensionless analysis to identify an optimal expansion machine for each case. The impact of varying the working fluid used was investigated, since it had a large impact on the results obtained and provided insights into design dependencies in these systems.

[1]  Gequn Shu,et al.  A review of researches on thermal exhaust heat recovery with Rankine cycle , 2011 .

[2]  S. D. Probert,et al.  Expansion machine for a low power-output steam Rankine-cycle engine , 1991 .

[3]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Testing and modeling a scroll expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2009 .

[4]  F. J. Robinson.  A Comparison Between Trochoidal, Rotary Vane and Reciprocating Expanders , 1981 .

[5]  Richard Stobart,et al.  Heat Recovery and Bottoming Cycles for SI and CI Engines - A Perspective , 2006 .

[6]  O. E. Baljé,et al.  A Study on Design Criteria and Matching of Turbomachines: Part A—Similarity Relations and Design Criteria of Turbines , 1962 .

[7]  Peter Geskes,et al.  Use of Exhaust Gas Energy in Heavy Trucks Using the Rankine Process , 2012 .

[8]  S. D. Probert,et al.  Multi-Vane expanders as prime movers for low-grade energy organic Rankine-cycle engines , 1984 .

[9]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Waste Heat Recovery of Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines by Organic Rankine Cycle Part I: Hybrid Energy System of Diesel and Rankine Engines , 2007 .

[10]  Stephan Bartosch,et al.  Waste Heat Recovery in Drive Systems of Today and Tomorrow , 2011 .

[11]  Sven B Andersson,et al.  Comparison of Working Fluids in Both Subcritical and Supercritical Rankine Cycles for Waste-Heat Recovery Systems in Heavy-Duty Vehicles , 2012 .

[12]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Technological and Economical Survey of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems , 2009 .

[13]  Takahashi Kazuya,et al.  Study on Maximizing Exergy in Automotive Engines , 2007 .

[14]  Rodolfo Taccani,et al.  Performance Analysis and Modeling of Different Volumetric Expanders for Small-Scale Organic Rankine Cycles , 2011 .

[15]  Tilmann Abbe Horst,et al.  The Second Generation Turbosteamer , 2012, MTZ worldwide.

[16]  Ho Teng,et al.  A Rankine Cycle System for Recovering Waste Heat from HD Diesel Engines - WHR System Development , 2011 .

[17]  Antonio García,et al.  HD Diesel engine equipped with a bottoming Rankine cycle as a waste heat recovery system. Part 1: Study and analysis of the waste heat energy , 2012 .