Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Understanding the wavelength dependence of galaxy structure with bulge-disc decompositions

With a large sample of bright, low-redshift galaxies with optical–near-IR imaging from the GAMA survey we use bulge-disc decompositions to understand the wavelength-dependent behaviour of single-Sersic structural measurements. We denote the variation in single-Sersic index with wavelength as N, likewise for effective radius we use R. We find that most galaxies with a substantial disc, even those with no discernable bulge, display a high value of N. The increase in Sersic index to longer wavelengths is therefore intrinsic to discs, apparently resulting from radial variations in stellar population and/or dust reddening. Similarly, low values of R (< 1) are found to be ubiquitous, implying an element of universality in galaxy colour gradients. We also study how bulge and disc colour distributions vary with galaxy type. We find that, rather than all bulges being red and all discs being blue in absolute terms, both components become redder for galaxies with redder total colours. We even observe that bulges in bluer galaxies are typically bluer than discs in red galaxies, and that bulges and discs are closer in colour for fainter galaxies. Trends in total colour are therefore not solely due to the colour or flux dominance of the bulge or disc.

[1]  B. T. Dullo,et al.  CENTRAL STELLAR MASS DEFICITS IN THE BULGES OF LOCAL LENTICULAR GALAXIES, AND THE CONNECTION WITH COMPACT z ∼ 1.5 GALAXIES , 2013, 1303.1273.

[2]  S. Bamford,et al.  MegaMorph: classifying galaxy morphology using multi-wavelength Sérsic profile fits , 2015, 1502.05627.

[3]  Emmanuel Bertin,et al.  The EFIGI catalogue of 4458 nearby galaxies with morphology - II. Statistical properties along the Hubble sequence , 2011, 1103.5735.

[4]  Harald Kuntschner,et al.  The SAURON project – IX. A kinematic classification for early‐type galaxies , 2007, astro-ph/0703531.

[5]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Color Separation of Galaxy Types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data , 2001, astro-ph/0107201.

[6]  Ralf Bender,et al.  A Proposed Revision of the Hubble Sequence for Elliptical Galaxies , 1996 .

[7]  B. Cunow Disc scalelengths of non‐active and active spiral galaxies , 2001 .

[8]  D. Gadotti Structural properties of pseudo-bulges, classical bulges and elliptical galaxies: a Sloan Digital Sky Survey perspective , 2008, 0810.1953.

[9]  A. Kinney,et al.  The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9911459.

[10]  M. Seigar,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of Disk Galaxies , 2014 .

[11]  S. Bamford,et al.  MegaMorph – multiwavelength measurement of galaxy structure. Sérsic profile fits to galaxies near and far , 2013, 1307.4996.

[12]  Simon P. Driver,et al.  The Millennium Galaxy Catalogue: bulge–disc decomposition of 10 095 nearby galaxies , 2006, astro-ph/0605699.

[13]  D. Terry,et al.  Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems || Elliptical and Disk Galaxy Structure and Modern Scaling Laws , 2013 .

[14]  J. J.,et al.  The Realm of the Nebulae , 1936, Nature.

[15]  C. Lintott,et al.  Galaxy Zoo: Dust in Spirals , 2010, 1001.1744.

[16]  Harald Kuntschner,et al.  The SAURON project – XVII. Stellar population analysis of the absorption line strength maps of 48 early-type galaxies , 2010, 1006.1574.

[17]  S. Brough,et al.  Spatially resolved kinematics and stellar populations of brightest cluster and group galaxies , 2007, 0704.3097.

[18]  C. Carollo,et al.  Spiral Galaxies with WFPC2.I.Nuclear Morphology, Bulges, Star Clusters, and Surface Brightness Profiles , 1997 .

[19]  E. Hubble The Realm of the Nebulæ , 1956, Nature.

[20]  Ivan K. Baldry,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Structural Investigation of Galaxies via Model Analysis , 2011, 1112.1956.

[21]  A. Graham,et al.  HST Photometry of Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies in Coma, and an Explanation for the Alleged Structural Dichotomy between Dwarf and Bright Elliptical Galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0303391.

[22]  P. Lopes,et al.  Spheroid's Panchromatic Investigation in Different Environmental Regions (SPIDER) - I. Sample and galaxy parameters in the grizYJHK wavebands , 2009, 0912.4547.

[23]  U. Maryland,et al.  The formation and evolution of Virgo cluster galaxies – I. Broad-band optical and infrared colours , 2011, 1105.0006.

[24]  K. Alatalo,et al.  The ATLAS3D project - II. Morphologies, kinemetric features and alignment between photometric and kinematic axes of early-type galaxies , 2011, 1102.3801.

[25]  M. Irwin,et al.  The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS) , 2006, astro-ph/0604426.

[26]  L. Ho,et al.  Detailed structural decomposition of galaxy images , 2002, astro-ph/0204182.

[27]  S. Bergh A new classification system for galaxies. , 1976 .

[28]  M. Baes,et al.  The distribution of interstellar dust in CALIFA edge-on galaxies via oligochromatic radiative transfer fitting , 2014, 1403.7527.

[29]  Simon P. Driver,et al.  A Concise Reference to (Projected) Sérsic R 1/n Quantities, Including Concentration, Profile Slopes, Petrosian Indices, and Kron Magnitudes , 2005, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[30]  C. Conselice,et al.  The mass evolution of the first galaxies: stellar mass functions and star formation rates at 4 < z < 7 in the CANDELS GOODS-South field , 2014, 1408.2527.

[31]  D. Gadotti Secular evolution and structural properties of stellar bars in galaxies , 2010, 1003.1719.

[32]  C. Carollo The Centers of Early- to Intermediate-Type Spiral Galaxies: A Structural Analysis , 1999 .

[33]  R. Saglia,et al.  Structural properties of discs and bulges of early-type galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0410121.

[34]  J. Lucey,et al.  Colours of bulges and discs within galaxy clusters and the signature of disc fading on infall , 2010, 1007.1002.

[35]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): ugrizYJHK Sérsic luminosity functions and the cosmic spectral energy distribution by Hubble type , 2014, 1401.1817.

[36]  E. al.,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.

[37]  D. Fisher,et al.  SUBMITTED TO APJ Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 A CONNECTION BETWEEN BULGE PROPERTIES AND THE BIMODALITY OF GALAXIES , 2022 .

[38]  Chien Y. Peng,et al.  DETAILED DECOMPOSITION OF GALAXY IMAGES. II. BEYOND AXISYMMETRIC MODELS , 2009, 0912.0731.

[39]  Dependence of Galaxy Structure on Rest-Frame Wavelength and Galaxy Type* , 2006, astro-ph/0612558.

[40]  Changbom Park,et al.  Morphology Segregation of Galaxies in Color-Color Gradient Space , 2005, astro-ph/0511385.

[41]  J. Kormendy,et al.  Pseudobulges in the Disk Galaxies NGC 7690 and NGC 4593 , 2006, astro-ph/0601393.

[42]  The Formation of Disks in Elliptical Galaxies , 2001, astro-ph/0103476.

[43]  B. Gibson,et al.  Star formation history of barred disc galaxies , 2011, 1103.3796.

[44]  S. Bamford,et al.  GAMA: towards a physical understanding of galaxy formation , 2009, 0910.5123.

[45]  Andreas Burkert,et al.  BULGE n AND B/T IN HIGH-MASS GALAXIES: CONSTRAINTS ON THE ORIGIN OF BULGES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELS , 2008, 0807.0040.

[46]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  The ATLAS3D project - VII. A new look at the morphology of nearby galaxies: the kinematic morphology-density relation , 2011, 1104.3545.

[47]  W. Graham OF ELLIPTICAL AND DISC GALAXY STRUCTURE , AND MODERN SCALING LAWS To appear in “ Planets , Stars and Stellar Systems , 2012 .

[48]  J. E. Gunn,et al.  Astrophysically Motivated Bulge-Disk Decompositions of SDSS Galaxies , 2012, 1201.0763.

[49]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the wavelength dependence of galaxy structure versus redshift and luminosity , 2015, 1509.06756.

[50]  Simon P. Driver,et al.  THE MILLENNIUM GALAXY CATALOGUE: EXPLORING THE COLOR–CONCENTRATION BIMODALITY VIA BULGE–DISK DECOMPOSITION , 2009, 0904.3096.

[51]  R. Evans The variation of the scalelengths of galaxies at different wavelengths , 1994 .

[52]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release , 2010, 1009.0614.

[53]  S. Roweis,et al.  K-Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared , 2006, astro-ph/0606170.

[54]  Jr.,et al.  Evolution since z = 0.5 of the Morphology-Density Relation for Clusters of Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9707232.

[55]  C. Boisson,et al.  Host galaxies of AGN , 2001, astro-ph/0111331.

[56]  B. T. Dullo,et al.  HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT: AN ABUNDANCE OF COMPACT MASSIVE SPHEROIDS IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE , 2015, 1502.07024.

[57]  G. Bruzual,et al.  Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.

[58]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the wavelength-dependent sizes and profiles of galaxies revealed by MegaMorph , 2014, 1404.0377.

[59]  S. Bamford,et al.  Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Structural Investigation of Galaxies via Model Analysis (SIGMA) , 2011 .

[60]  R. Peletier,et al.  Galactic Bulges from Hubble Space Telescope Near-Infrared Camera Multi-Object Spectrometer Observations: The Lack of r1/4 Bulges , 2003 .

[61]  Robert C. Nichol,et al.  MegaMorph - multiwavelength measurement of galaxy structure: complete Sersic profile information from modern surveys , 2012, 1212.3332.

[62]  M. Prieto,et al.  On the bulge-to-disk size ratio for spiral galaxies , 2001 .

[63]  S. Jogee,et al.  Bars in Disk-dominated and Bulge-dominated Galaxies at z ~ 0: New Insights from ~3600 SDSS Galaxies , 2007, 0710.4674.

[64]  Properties of Bars and Bulges in the Hubble Sequence , 2007, astro-ph/0702434.

[65]  Timothy M. Heckman,et al.  The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei , 2003 .

[66]  B. Haussler,et al.  MegaMorph – multiwavelength measurement of galaxy structure: physically meaningful bulge–disc decomposition of galaxies near and far , 2014, 1408.4070.

[67]  R. Peletier,et al.  Ages of galaxy bulges and disks from optical and near-infrared colors , 1996, astro-ph/9602088.

[68]  S. Courteau,et al.  Stellar population trends in S0 galaxies , 2010, 1010.1247.

[69]  C. Möllenhoff Disk-bulge decompositions of spiral galaxies in UBVRI , 2004 .

[70]  G. Piotto,et al.  Photographic and CCD surface photometry of nine early-type galaxies , 1988 .

[71]  J. A. Vázquez-Mata,et al.  Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): End of survey report and data release 2 , 2015, 1506.08222.

[72]  S. Courteau,et al.  A survey of 286 Virgo cluster galaxies at optical griz and near-IR H band: surface brightness profiles and bulge–disc decompositions , 2011, 1105.0002.

[73]  Photometric properties and origin of bulges in SB0 galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0501163.

[74]  Luc Simard,et al.  A CATALOG OF BULGE+DISK DECOMPOSITIONS AND UPDATED PHOTOMETRY FOR 1.12 MILLION GALAXIES IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2011, 1107.1518.

[75]  J. Lucey,et al.  Dissecting the red sequence: the bulge and disc colours of early-type galaxies in the Coma cluster , 2014, 1402.4135.

[76]  J. Brinkmann,et al.  The physical properties of star-forming galaxies in the low-redshift universe , 2003, astro-ph/0311060.

[77]  R. Peletier,et al.  Galactic bulges from Hubble Space Telescope NICMOS observations: the lack of r^{1/4} bulges , 2002, astro-ph/0212184.

[78]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  The ATLAS3D project – III. A census of the stellar angular momentum within the effective radius of early‐type galaxies: unveiling the distribution of fast and slow rotators , 2011, 1102.4444.

[79]  R. Sanders,et al.  Exponential bulges in late-type spirals : an improved description of the light distribution. , 1994 .

[80]  K. Alatalo,et al.  The ATLAS3D project - XVII. Linking photometric and kinematic signatures of stellar discs in early-type galaxies , 2012, 1210.8167.