Helicopter aeroelastic analysis with spatially uncertain rotor blade properties

Abstract This paper investigates the effects of spatially uncertain material properties on the aeroelastic response predictions (e.g., rotating frequencies, vibratory loads, etc.) of composite helicopter rotor. Initially, the spatial uncertainty is modeled as discrete random variables along the blade span and uncertainty analysis is performed with direct Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). Uncertainty effects on the rotating frequencies vary with the higher-order modes in a non-linear way. Each modal frequency is found to be more sensitive to the uncertainty at certain sections of the rotor blade than uncertainty at other sections. Uncertainty effects on the vibratory hub load predictions are studied in the next stage. To reduce the computational expense of stochastic aeroelastic analysis, a high-dimensional model representation (HDMR) method is developed to approximate the aeroelastic response as functions of blade stiffness properties which are modeled as random fields. Karhunen–Loeve expansion and a lower-order expansion are used to represent the input and outputs, respectively, in the HDMR formulation which is similar to the spectral stochastic finite element method. The proposed method involves the approximation of the system response with lower-dimensional HDMR, the response surface generation of HDMR component functions, and Monte Carlo simulation. The proposed approach decouples the computationally expensive aeroelastic simulations and uncertainty analysis. MCS, performed with computationally less expensive HDMR models, shows that spatial uncertainty has considerable influence on the vibratory hub load predictions.

[1]  A. Nouy Recent Developments in Spectral Stochastic Methods for the Numerical Solution of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations , 2009 .

[2]  H. Rabitz,et al.  General foundations of high‐dimensional model representations , 1999 .

[3]  A. Meher Prasad,et al.  High dimensional model representation for piece‐wise continuous function approximation , 2007 .

[4]  Fabrice Poirion,et al.  On some stochastic methods applied to aeroservoelasticity , 2000 .

[5]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Material uncertainty propagation in helicopter nonlinear aeroelastic response and vibration analysis , 2008 .

[6]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  An optimization approach to vibration reduction in helicopter rotors with multiple active trailing edge flaps , 2004 .

[7]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Survey of Recent Developments in Rotorcraft Design Optimization , 2004 .

[8]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Uncertainty analysis near bifurcation of an aeroelastic system , 2010 .

[9]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Effect of uncertainty on helicopter performance predictions , 2010 .

[10]  H. Rabitz,et al.  High Dimensional Model Representations , 2001 .

[11]  Rajib Chowdhury,et al.  Enhanced high‐dimensional model representation for reliability analysis , 2009 .

[12]  D. Yadav,et al.  Stochastic Finite Element Buckling Analysis of Laminated Plates With Circular Cutout Under Uniaxial Compression , 2007 .

[13]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Genetic fuzzy system for damage detection in beams and helicopter rotor blades , 2003 .

[14]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Effects of Uncertainty on Nonlinear Plate Aeroelastic Response , 2002 .

[15]  Rajib Chowdhury,et al.  Assessment of high dimensional model representation techniques for reliability analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Ranjan Ganguli,et al.  Aeroelastic Response of Composite Helicopter Rotor with Random Material Properties , 2008 .

[17]  Luca Bruno,et al.  Stochastic aerodynamics and aeroelasticity of a flat plate via generalised Polynomial Chaos , 2009 .

[18]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  SOLVING STOCHASTIC PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS BASED ON THE EXPERIMENTAL DATA , 2003 .

[19]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  High dimensional model representation for stochastic finite element analysis , 2010 .

[20]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Theorems and examples on high dimensional model representation , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Global uncertainty assessments by high dimensional model representations (HDMR) , 2002 .

[22]  S. Sriramula,et al.  Quantification of uncertainty modelling in stochastic analysis of FRP composites , 2009 .

[23]  Enrico Cestino,et al.  Structural Uncertainty Effect on Classical Wing Flutter Characteristics , 2010 .

[24]  A. Nouy Generalized spectral decomposition method for solving stochastic finite element equations : Invariant subspace problem and dedicated algorithms , 2008 .

[25]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  On solving elliptic stochastic partial differential equations , 2002 .

[26]  T. Fang,et al.  Flutter analysis of an airfoil with bounded random parameters in incompressible flow via Gegenbauer polynomial approximation , 2007 .

[27]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach , 1990 .

[28]  Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al.  Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. , 1985 .

[29]  Omer Soykasap,et al.  Inverse method in tilt-rotor optimization , 2001 .

[30]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Transonic Aeroelastic Stability Predictions Under the Influence of Structural Variability , 2010 .

[31]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Aeroelasticity: Recent Results and Research Challenges , 2004 .

[32]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of a Nonlinear Aeroelastic Model Using the Response Surface Method , 2006 .