Three Modes of Deviation Handling: Coping with Unexpected Events in Project Management

Most of the project management tools suggested in the literature are effective under perfect conditions with unlimited resources. However by definition, projects are neither unlimited in time nor resources, which creates a gap between the perfect conditions and the reality that most project managers and teams face. The case studies that this paper investigates are based on in-depth participative observations, interviews, emails and other written material. The results are rather surprising as project teams do not seem to use methods suggested in the literature when responding to the sudden appearance of unexpected situations, that is; deviations. The cases give an insight into the dynamics of project management and how informal teams are used to increase speed and flexibility. These informal teams could meet when needed in order to discuss and solve problems or changes. Further, in two of the cases, traditional project planning was not used at the top management level to plan and coordinate the projects. Thus, the cases show that the management of projects according to traditional plans is not the only means of making a project successful. Instead, the creation of a flexible organization that can identify, react, and act upon the changes that most likely will occur becomes more crucial in order to be able to successfully deliver the project

[1]  Alex Pavlak.  Project Troubleshooting: Tiger Teams for Reactive Risk Management , 2004 .

[2]  Kristian Kreiner.  In search of relevance: Project management in drifting environments , 1995 .

[3]  K. Roberts.  Managing High Reliability Organizations , 1990 .

[4]  Mats Engwall.  Jakten på det effektiva projektet , 1995 .

[5]  Damir Novosel,et al.  How to Manage Complex, Multinational R&D Projects Successfully , 2002 .

[6]  Dov Dvir,et al.  Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success , 2004 .

[7]  Lars Taxén,et al.  Managing complex development projects : a case study of the use if the system anatomy , 2005 .

[8]  Timothy J. Kloppenborg,et al.  The Current State of Project Management Research: Trends, Interpretations, and Predictions , 2002 .

[9]  John M. Nicholas.  Project Management for Business and Technology: Principles and Practice , 2000 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Robert G. Bea,et al.  When systems fail , 2001 .

[12]  Steven Pender,et al.  Managing incomplete knowledge: Why risk management is not sufficient , 2001 .

[13]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[14]  P. Beaumont.  Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity Karl Weick, Kathleen Sutcliffe, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2001, ISBN 0-7879-5627-9, pp. 200 , 2002 .

[15]  Dragan Z. Milosevic.  Project Management ToolBox: Tools and Techniques for the Practicing Project Manager , 2003 .

[16]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects , 2004 .

[17]  William R. King,et al.  Project Management Handbook , 1983 .

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  Mats Engwall,et al.  The Futile Dream for the Perfect Goal , 2002 .

[20]  Lars Taxén,et al.  Manifesting Shared Affordances in System Development – the System Anatomy , 2005 .

[21]  Scott D. Sagan,et al.  Learning from Normal Accidents , 2004 .

[22]  Bruce T. Barkley.  Project Risk Management , 2004 .

[23]  Rolf A. Lundin,et al.  Neo-Industrial Organising: Renewal by Action and Knowledge Formation in a Project-intensive Economy , 1999 .

[24]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[25]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[26]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Project Management: A Managerial Approach , 1989 .

[27]  P.-E Josephson,et al.  The causes and costs of defects in construction. A study of seven building projects , 1999 .

[28]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Managing the unexpected , 2001 .

[29]  Niclas Adler.  Managing complex product development : three approaches , 1999 .

[30]  Marcus Lindahl.  Produktion till varje pris : om planering och improvisation i anläggningsprojekt , 2003 .

[31]  A. J. Grimes.  Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[32]  Mats Engwall,et al.  Cheetah teams in product development: the most extreme form of temporary organization? ☆ , 2004 .