Tangible Data Exploration: Creating Card Games for Sensemaking

Participatory sensing has largely focused on the collection and dissemination of data, paying little attention to the fact that people often struggle to use the data and relate it to their daily lives. However, data is strongly connected to the context, environment and community within which it is gathered, whether by human or machine. Thus, those who are local to the data - especially those who participate in its collection - can bring valuable insights and can themselves gain value from interpreting it. This paper offers an approach for designing interactive narrative games with civic datasets, which are designed to make data easier to interact with, discuss and share in informal settings. It describes the planning and execution of a public data exploration event based around these activities. This work will be of use to people who are designing civic interfaces to support participatory sensemaking from data, especially in informal settings.

[1]  C. Tupling All data are local: thinking critically in a data-driven society , 2020, Information, Communication & Society.

[2]  M. Castillo,et al.  The wisdom of crowds , 2019, Nov/Dec 2016.

[3]  Drew Hemment,et al.  Stop the Noise! Enhancing Meaningfulness in Participatory Sensing with Community Level Indicators , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Martin Tomitsch,et al.  A Study of Urban Heat: Understanding the Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Wicked Problems in HCI , 2018, CHI.

[5]  N. Riche,et al.  Design Patterns for Data Comics , 2018, CHI.

[6]  Yuri Engelhardt,et al.  Narrative Design Patterns for Data-Driven Storytelling , 2018 .

[7]  Marian Petre,et al.  Creating a Datascape: a game to support communities in using open data , 2017, C&T.

[8]  Sayamindu Dasgupta,et al.  Youth Perspectives on Critical Data Literacies , 2017, CHI.

[9]  Catherine D'Ignazio,et al.  Data Murals: Using the Arts to Build Data Literacy , 2016, J. Community Informatics.

[10]  Gerd Kortuem,et al.  Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society , 2016, J. Community Informatics.

[11]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Sens-Us: Designing Innovative Civic Technology for the Public Good , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[12]  Bettina Nissen,et al.  Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data , 2016, CHI.

[13]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  Data, Design and Civics: An Exploratory Study of Civic Tech , 2016, CHI.

[14]  Frank Maurer,et al.  Datathons: An Experience Report of Data Hackathons for Data Science Education , 2016, SIGCSE.

[15]  Erno Salmela,et al.  Is Time Pressure an Advantage or a Disadvantage for Front End Innovation – Case Digital Jewelry , 2016 .

[16]  David Sweeney,et al.  Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community , 2015, CHI.

[17]  David Engel,et al.  Collective Intelligence in Computer-Mediated Collaboration Emerges in Different Contexts and Cultures , 2015, CHI.

[18]  Charlene Jennett,et al.  Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science?: a study of volunteer motivations , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[20]  David Pearson,et al.  Assessing Exhibits for Learning in Science Centers: A Practical Tool , 2010 .

[21]  B. Penders,et al.  Research in the wild , 2007, Nature.

[22]  John H. Falk,et al.  Time and behavior as predictors of learning , 1983 .

[23]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Engaging with the Smart City Through Urban Data Games , 2017 .

[24]  Rahul Bhargava,et al.  Approaches to Building Big Data Literacy , 2015 .

[25]  Scott Heggen,et al.  Participatory sensing: repurposing a scientific tool for STEM education , 2013, INTR.